Belgian annexation plans after the Second World War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 20:50, 5 December 2015 (Dating maintenance tags: {{Cn}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

After the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II in 1945, Belgium planned to annex parts of the territory along the Belgian–German border. In addition to monetary compensations and the lending of labour forces, this was considered a way of reparations. In mid-April 1949, Belgium surprisingly waived any interest in most of the previously claimed areas.

Actual assignments

Map of territorial changes

On 1 April 1949 (prior to the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany), the border areas in the territories of North Rhine-Westphalia and Rhineland-Palatinate were temporarily divested to Belgium. These included the following areas:

Originally, several German exclaves enclosed by Belgian territory were planned. These enclaves still exist, as the route of the Vennbahn railway is Belgian territory and thus divides the populated places west of it from the rest of the German territory. These places are:

Furthermore, there are several forested areas in the region between the Belgian town of Elsenborn and the German Kalterherberg.

It was planned that the inhabitants of these areas should provisionally remain German citizens in spite of the shifted border.

After the war, Belgium had gradually withdrawn her territorial claims. According to the Allied order of 26 March 1949, several populated places and the Vennbahn, which was of special interest for Belgium, should be handed over.[2] However, on 15 April 1949, a sudden change of mind occurred in Belgium.[3] The Belgian government officially declared that it waived the claims to most places and territories that been assigned to Belgium. This waiver was allegedly not the result of the ongoing protest by the state government of North Rhine-Westphalia, but an insight into the inefficiency of the boundary corrections by Belgium. Because establishing the Vennbahn railway would require huge resources over the years, as had been assessed by Belgium, it was decided to refrain from adding adjacent villages to the military administration. Moreover, the Belgian government did not see any support from a majority of the Belgian population for these measures.[2]

The return of the annexed territories to Germany took place on 28 August 1958 due to a German-Belgian border treaty from 24 September 1956. The place Losheimergraben and the western part of the Leykaul municipality, as well as some forests, were excluded from this restoration. These areas remained in Belgium, and so did the previously Belgian municipalities of Eupen and Malmedy that had been incorporated into the German Reich in 1940. [citation needed]

In January 2008, it was announced by Belgian Deputy District Commissioner Marcel Lejoly that the planned removal of the Vennbahn rails could have "international consequences", and it was speculated that the neighbouring areas had to be returned to Germany.[4] But both the Belgian Foreign Ministry as well as the Foreign Office in Germany declared, that the boundaries were ultimately covered by contract and therefore no change would take place. The German-Belgian border treaty of 1956 cited by the Foreign Office does, however, not contain any indications as to what should happen if the railway facilities mentioned in the contract cease to exist. Therefore, the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles that are not superseded still govern the current borders. Moreover, the option of restoring the railway traffic has not been abandoned and also a bicycle route that has been planned on the former Vennbahn track would not change the borderline.[5]

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ "Karte von der Landesgrenze zwischen dem Deutschen Reiche und Belgien festgesetzt durch den Grenzregelungsausschuß Januar 1920 - Oktober 1922 #20". Retrieved 2013-05-04.
  2. ^ a b Diet of North Rhine Westphalia. 190, No. 442. Vol. 1. Central State Archives Düsseldorf. Cited by Woelk 1994, p. 87
  3. ^ Blank, Bettina (1995). Die westdeutschen Länder und die Entstehung der Bundesrepublik. Studien zur Zeitgeschichte (in German). Munich: Oldenbourg. pp. 219–220. ISBN 978-3-486-56108-1. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ "Belgien könnte Staatsgebiet an Deutschland verlieren – Große Fragen zum Ende einer kleinen Eisenbahn". Tagesschau (in German). 9 January 2008. Archived from the original on 19 September 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ "Belgien behält seine Exklaven in Deutschland" (in German). Westdeutscher Rundfunk. 17 January 2008. Archived from the original on 17 January 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
General references
  • Elzer, Herbert (2006). Zwischen Rheinstaat und Westeuropäischem Bündnis. Großbritannien, Frankreich, die kleineren alliierten Nachbarn und die Besatzung Nordwestdeutschlands 1945. Düsseldorfer Schriften zur Neueren Landesgeschichte und zur Geschichte Nordrhein-Westfalens (in German). Essen. pp. 175 ff. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • Woelk, Wolfgang (1995). "Das Grenzland von Nordrhein-Westfalen, die Traktatländereien und die niederländischen Grenzkorrekturen 1949 bis 1963". Jahrbuch. Zentrum für Niederlande-Studien (in German) (5/6). Münster: Center for Netherlands-Studies: 85 ff. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Belgian_annexation_plans_after_the_Second_World_War&oldid=693915128"