Constructal law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Constructal theory)
Jump to: navigation, search
Design in nature is flow. The two sides of the constructal law are these: we predict the occurrence of design in nature, and we design devices for human use.

Constructal law is the law of physics that accounts for the universal phenomenon of generation of design (configuration, pattern, geometry) in nature. This phenomenon and the constructal law unite all animate and inanimate systems.[1] The constructal law was stated by Adrian Bejan in 1996 as follows: "For a finite-size system to persist in time (to live), it must evolve in such a way that it provides easier access to the imposed currents that flow through it."[2][3]

The tree is the natural flow design for achieving flow access between one point and a volume. Alternating trees achieve flow access between two planes. Natural porous media exhibit multi-scale flow structures consistent with the multiple scales and performance of alternating trees.

"Constructal" is a word coined by Adrian Bejan, in order to describe the natural tendency of flow systems (rivers, trees and branches,[4] lungs, tectonic plates [5] as well as engineered forms) [6] to generate and evolve structures that increase flow access.[2][7]

Introduction[edit]

The constructal law was proposed in 1996 as a summary of all design generation and evolution phenomena in nature, bio and non-bio. The constructal law represents three steps toward making “design in nature” a concept and law-based domain in science:[3]

  1. Life is flow: all flow systems are live systems, the animate and the inanimate.[1]
  2. Design generation and evolution is a phenomenon of physics.[8]
  3. Designs have the universal tendency to evolve in a certain direction in time.[9]

The constructal law is proposed as a first principle of physics accounting for all design and evolution in nature. It holds that shape and structure arise to facilitate flow. The designs that happen spontaneously in nature reflect this tendency: they allow entities to flow more easily – to measurably move more current farther and faster per unit of useful energy consumed.[5][10][11][12][13][14][15] Rain drops, for example, coalesce and move together, generating rivulets, streams and the mighty river basins of the world because this design allows them to move more easily.[16]

The constructal law asks the question: Why does this design arise at all? Why can't the water just seep through the ground? The constructal law provides this answer: Because the water flows better with design. The constructal law covers the tendency of nature to generate designs to facilitate flow.[17]

Various manifestations of the law[edit]

The constructal law covers natural phenomena of organization, such as tree-shaped flows, round tubes and bones, scaling laws, etc. The lightning bolts that flash across the sky generate a tree-like structure because this is a good design for moving a current (electricity) from an area (the cloud) to a point (a church steeple or another cloud). The circulatory and nervous systems of biological creatures generate a similar tree-like design because they too are moving currents from a point to an area and from an area to a point.[18]

Although treelike structures are a very common design in nature, they are only one manifestation of the constructal law. In a simple example, logs floating on a lake or icebergs at sea orient themselves perpendicular to the wind which increases the transfer of motion from the moving air body to the water body. A more complex example is the design of animals that have evolved to move mass more efficiently (to cover more distance per unit of useful energy) across the landscape.[19][20][21][22]

This includes the seemingly “characteristic” sizes of organs, the shape of bones, the rhythm of breathing lungs and beating hearts, of undulating tails, running legs, and flapping wings. The constructal law proclaims that all these designs have arisen—and work together—to allow animals, like raindrops in a river basin, to move more easily across a landscape.[23][24] Because human beings are not separate from but a part of nature, their designs are also governed by the constructal law.[20][25][26]

Evolutionary design[edit]

The constructal law defines the time direction of all evolutionary design phenomena. It states that designs should evolve over time to acquire better configurations to provide more access for the currents that flow through them. It defines in physics terms what it means to be “better”, more "fit", to “survive”, and to be efficient. Not all changes are improvements, but those that stick measurably enhance flow.[7][27]

Constructal design occurs at every scale. Each component of an evolving flow system—each rivulet, each tree, and each road—acquires evolving designs to facilitate flow access. As these elements coalesce into larger and larger structures (into evolving river basins, forests and transport networks), a hierarchy emerges such that the multi sized components and channels work together so that everything flows more easily.[16] This is seen in the shape and structure of the neural networks in the brain, of the alveoli in the lung, the size and distribution of vegetation in the forest and of human settlements on the map.[20][26][28]

In the big picture, all the mating and morphing flows on the largest system that surrounds us, the Earth itself, evolve to enhance global flow. For example, trees and other forms of vegetation that move moisture from the ground to the air are components of the larger global system, including forests, river basins and weather patterns, that have the tendency to equilibrate all the moisture on Earth.[17][29] The constructal law states that every flow system is destined to remain imperfect. The direction of design evolution is toward distributing the imperfections of the system, such that the “whole” flows easier (e.g., river basin, animal body, human vehicle).[30]

Evolution never ends. Optimality statements (minimum, maximum, optimum, static, end design, destiny) have only local, limited applicability. The constructal law covers them because it is about the time direction of all the evolutionary design phenomenon.

The constructal law is a law of physics - the law of design generation and evolution in nature. The natural phenomenon is not the elimination but the distribution (better and better over time) of imperfection. The distribution of imperfection generates the geometry (shape, structure) of the system.[12][31][32][33][34][35][35] Today, optimization of many systems arising in thermal engineering such as conductive pathways (fins,[33] cavities [12][34][36][37] and highly conductive inserts), convective channels[32][38][39][40] and radiative systems [41] are inspired by constructal law.

For example, in point-area and point-volume flows, the constructal law predicts tree architectures, such flows displaying at least two regimes: one highly resistive and one with lower resistivity. The constructal-law tendency manifests itself at every scale.[42]

Some domains of application
Application What flows Tree channels: Low Resistivity Interstitial spaces: High Resistivity
Packages of electronics Heat High-conductivity inserts (blades, needles) Low conductivity substrate
Urban traffic People Low-resistance street car traffic Street walking in urban structure
River basins Water Low-resistance rivulet and rivers Darcy flow through porous media
Lungs Air Low-resistance airways, bronchial passages diffusion in alveoli tissues
Circulatory system Blood Low-resistance blood vessels, capillaries, arteries, veins diffusion in capillaries tissues

The constructal law provides a unifying theory of evolution. It holds that inanimate and animate phenomena generate evolving configurations to move more easily. The constructal law also provides the physics definition of life, of what it means to be alive. It states that life means flow and the free generation of design. If the flows stop, the system is dead (in thermodynamic equilibrium). The constructal law is the physics law of life, design and evolution.[1][8][18]

Constructal thermodynamics[edit]

Thermodynamics rests on two laws. Both are first principles: The first law commands the conservation of energy, and the second law commands irreversibility: the tendency of all currents to flow from high (temperature, pressure) to low. These two laws are about systems in the most general sense, viewed as black boxes, without shape and structure.

The two laws of thermodynamics do not account for nature completely. Nature is not made of black boxes. Nature’s boxes are filled with evolving, freely morphing configurations—even the fact that they have names (rivers, blood vessels) is due to their appearance, organization, or design. Where the second law commands that things should flow from high to low, the constructal law commands that they evolve in configurations that flow more and more easily over time.[31]

Classical thermodynamics versus constructal thermodynamics
Thermodynamics Constructal theory
State Flow architecture (flow structure)
Process Change of structure (design change)
Properties Global objective and global constraints
Equilibrium state Equilibrium flow architecture
Fundamental relation Fundamental relation
Constrained equilibrium states Nonequilibrium architectures
Removal of constraints Increased freedom to morph
Energy minimum principle Evolution toward greater flow access

In contrast to fractal models of observed objects in nature, the constructal law is predictive and thus can be tested experimentally.[43][44][45][46] Many natural designs, animate and inanimate, have been explained and unified by the constructal law,[5][15][16][47][48] for example:

  • Global circulation and climate
  • River basin design: Horton's rules of stream numbers (~4) and lengths (~2), and all the other scaling rules (e.g., Melton, Hack) of river basins all over the world.
  • The distribution of city sizes and numbers, i.e. Zipf's law relating log (size) versus log (rank).
  • The distribution of tree sizes and numbers on the forest floor, which is also a Zipf line of log (size) versus log (rank).
  • The flow of education as a morphing vasculature on the globe, and the rigidity of university rankings.
  • Vision, cognition, and the "golden ratio" phenomenon.
  • The entire architecture of vegetation: roots, trunks, canopies, branches, leaves, and the forest, including the prediction of Leonardo da Vinci's rule, Huber's rule, and the Fibonacci sequence.
  • Pedestrian movement, speeds, and patterns
  • The emergence of urban traffic design
  • The entire morphogenesis of dendritic crystals (e.g., snowflakes), as a flow structure that facilitates the flow of the heat of solidification
  • The scaling law of all animal locomotion (running, flying, swimming): speeds, frequencies, forces and the work spent per unit of mass moved and distance traveled.
  • The evolution of speed in sports.
  • Kleiber's law, the relationship between metabolic rate and body size
  • The relationship between breathing and heart beating times and body size
  • The relationship between the mass transfer contact area and body mass
  • The human bronchial tree with 23 levels of bifurcation.
  • The dimensions of the alveolar sac,
  • The total length of the airways,
  • The total alveolar surface area,
  • The total resistance to oxygen transport in the respiratory tree.

Criticisms of constructal law[edit]

The main criticism of the constructal law is that its formulation is vague.[49][50] The constructal law states that “For a finite-size system to persist in time (to live), it must evolve in such a way that it provides easier access to the imposed currents that flow through it”, but there is neither a mention of what these “currents” are nor an explicit definition of what “providing easier access” means. As a result, constructal theory is very versatile, but often unconvincing: depending on the choices made for the currents and the “access” to them, it can lead to extremely different results.

The related criticism of the constructal law is that there has been no attempt to prove it from first principles. Contrarily to alternative theories of non-equilibrium thermodynamics,[51][52] there is no proof of constructal theory based on simplified systems of statistical physics. The claim that constructal theory is a fundamental principle of thermodynamics itself has also been disputed.[53]

Responses to criticisms of the constructal law[edit]

Bejan has responded to this criticism [54] by noting that one cannot prove a first principle based on other first principles. The constructal law is not about what flows, but about the physics phenomenon of how any flow system acquires its evolving configuration (design) over time. The constructal law is not about optimality (max, min, opt)—it is the definition of “life” in physics terms, and of the time direction of the changes in flow configuration.[55]

Bejan [54] also noted that the phenomenon governed by the constructal law (design in nature) is macroscopic (finite size, not infinitesimal). It is the birth of design and evolution of design in all the parts together. It is dynamic, not static. The evolution never ends. There is no end design, no destiny (max, min, opt).[56][57]

Bejan and Lorente expanded on this [56] by explaining the difference between a law of physics (e.g., the constructal law) and the many invocations of the law, which underpin many “theories” based on the law. In the section titled “The constructal law versus the second law of thermodynamics” they noted that the constructal law and the second law are first principles. The constructal law is a useful reminder not only of what was missing in physics and thermodynamics (the law of design and evolution) but also of what is present. For example, contrary to the critic’s view, the first and second laws of thermodynamics did not require any “proof based on simplified systems of statistical physics.”

The constructal law is a statement of a natural tendency—the time direction of the phenomenon. It is as non-mathematical as the original statements of the second law:

Clausius: No process is possible whose sole result is the transfer of heat from a body of lower temperature to a body of higher temperature.

Kelvin: Spontaneously, heat cannot flow from cold regions to hot regions without external work being performed on the system.

A new law does not have to be stated in mathematical terms. The mathematization of the second law statement (and of thermodynamics) came later. The constructal law underwent the same evolution. The 1996 statement was followed in 2004 by a complete mathematical formulation of constructal-law thermodynamics.[58]

Flow leads to better flow. Like any other law of physics, the constructal law is a concise summary of observed facts: the natural tendency of flow systems to evolve toward configurations that provide easier access over time. The word “access” means the ability to move through a confined space such as a crowded room. This is why “finite size” appears in the constructal law statement. This mental viewing covers all the flow design and evolution phenomena, animate and inanimate, because they all morph to enter and to flow better, more easily.[56][59]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c T. Basak, The law of life: the bridge between Physics and Biology. Phys Life Rev 8, 249-252 (2011)
  2. ^ a b Bejan, Adrian (1997). “Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics,” (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  3. ^ a b A. Kremer-Marietti and J. Dhombres, L’Épistemologie (Ellipses, Paris, 2006)
  4. ^ D. Tondeur, Y. Fan and L. Luo, Constructal optimization of arborescent structures with flow singularities. Chem Eng Sci 64, 3968−3982 (2009).
  5. ^ a b c S. Quéré, Constructal theory of plate tectonics. Int J Design & Nature Ecodyn 5, 242-253 (2010).
  6. ^ D. Queiros-Conde and M. Feidt, Eds., Constructal Theory and Multi-scale Geometries: Theory and Applications in Energetics, Chemical Engineering and Materials (Les Presses de L’ENSTA, Paris, 2009).
  7. ^ a b A. H. Reis, Constructal theory: from engineering to physics, and how flow systems develop shape and structure. Appl Mech Rev 59, 269-282 (2006).
  8. ^ a b L. Wang, Universality of design and its evolution. Phys Life Rev 8, 257-258 (2011)
  9. ^ N. Acuña, Mindshare. Igniting Creativity and Innovation Through Design Intelligence (Motion, Henderson, Nevada 2012).
  10. ^ A. F. Miguel, The physics principle of the generation of flow configuration, Phys Life Rev 8, 243-244 (2011)
  11. ^ MR Hajmohammadi, H Eskandari, M Saffar-Avval and A Campo, A new configuration of bend tubes for compound optimization of heat and fluid flow, Energy 62 (2013) 418-424.
  12. ^ a b c M. R. Hajmohammadi, S. Poozesh, A. Campo and Seyed Salman Nourazar, Valuable reconsideration in the constructal design of cavities, Energy Conversion and Management, 66 (2013) 33–40.
  13. ^ A. F. Miguel. Constructal pattern formation in stony corals, bacterial colonies and plant roots under different hydrodynamics conditions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 242, 954-961 (2006)
  14. ^ A. F. Miguel, A. Bejan. The principle that generates dissimilar patterns inside aggregates of organisms. Journal Physica A 388, 727-731 (2009)
  15. ^ a b A. H. Reis and C. Gama, Sand size versus beachface slope – an explanation based on the Constructal Law, Geomorphology 114, 276-283 (2010).
  16. ^ a b c A. H. Reis, Constructal view of scaling laws of river basins. Geomorphology 78, 201-206 (2006).
  17. ^ a b A. F. Miguel, Natural flow systems: acquiring their constructal morphology. Int J Design & Nature Ecodyn 5, 230-241 (2010).
  18. ^ a b A. H. Reis, Design in nature, and the laws of physics. Phys Life Rev 8, 255-256 (2011)
  19. ^ Bejan, A; Marden, James H. (2006). Constructing Animal Locomotion from New Thermodynamics Theory. American Scientist, July–August, Volume 94, Number 4
  20. ^ a b c G. Resconi, Morphotronics and Constructal theory, LINDI 2011, 3rd IEEE Int. Symp. Logistics and Industrial Informatics, Budapest, Hungary, August 25–27 (2011).
  21. ^ L. C. Kelley and K. Behan, Empathy & evolution: how dogs convert stress into flow. Psychology Today 6 August 2012.
  22. ^ L. C. Kelley and K. Behan, The canine mind bows to the Constructal Law. Psychology Today 16 October (2012).
  23. ^ Bejan, A (2010). The Constructal Law Origin of the Wheel, Size, and Skeleton in Animal Design. American Journal of Physics, Vol. 78, No. 7: 692-699
  24. ^ A. F. Miguel. Constructal theory of pedestrian dynamics. Physics Letters A 373, 1734-1738 (2009)
  25. ^ Bejan, A; Merkx, Gilbert A, eds. (2007). "Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics." New York: Springer.
  26. ^ a b P. Kalason, Épistémologie Constructale du Lien Cultuel (L’Harmattan, Paris, 2007).
  27. ^ Bejan, Adrian. "The Constructal Law of Organization in Nature: Tree-shaped flows and body size". Journal of Experimental Biology 208 (9): 1677–1686. 
  28. ^ Lorente, S; Bejan, A (2010). Few Large and Many Small: Hierarchy in Movement on Earth. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. Vol. 5, No. 3: 1–14.
  29. ^ Bejan, A; Lorente, S; Lee, J (2008). Unifying Constructal Theory of Tree Roots, Canopies and Forests. Journal of Theoretical Biology 254: 529–540
  30. ^ Y. Ventikos, The importance of the constructal framework in understanding and eventually replicating structure in tissue. Phys Life Rev 8, 241-242 (2011).
  31. ^ a b Bejan, A; Lorente, S (2008). “Design with Constructal Theory,” Hoboken: Wiley.
  32. ^ a b M. R. Hajmohammadi, E. Shirani, M. R. Salimpour and A. Campo, Constructal placement of unequal heat sources on a plate cooled by laminar forced convection, International Journal of Thermal sciences, 60 (2012) 13–22.
  33. ^ a b M. R. Hajmohammadi, S. Poozesh, S. S. Nourazar, Constructal design of multiple heat sources in a square-shaped fin, Journal of Process Mechanichal Engineering, 226 (2012) 324-336.
  34. ^ a b M. R. Hajmohammadi, V. Alizadeh Abianeh, M. Moezzinajafabadi and M. Daneshi, Fork-shaped highly conductive pathways for maximum cooling in a heat generating piece, Applied Thermal Engineering, 61 (2013) 228–235
  35. ^ a b M. Eslami and K. Jafarpur, Optimal distribution of imperfection in conductive constructal designs of arbitrary configurations. J Appl Phys 112, 104905 (2012).
  36. ^ A. Pouzesh, M. R. Hajmohammadi and S. Poozesh, Investigations on the internal shape of constructal cavities intruding a heat generating body, Thermal Science, DOI: 10.2298/TSCI120427164P 2012.
  37. ^ M.R. Hajmohammadi, O. Joneydi Shariatzadeh, M. Moulod and S.S. Nourazar, Phi and Psi shaped conductive routes for improved cooling in a heat generating piece, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 77 (2014) 66–74
  38. ^ M. R. Hajmohammadi, M. Rahmani, A. Campo and O. Joneydi Shariatzadeh, Optimal design of unequal heat flux elements for optimized heat transfer inside a rectangular duct, Energy, 68 (2014) 609-616.
  39. ^ M. R. Hajmohammadi, S. S. Nourazar, A. Campo and S. Poozesh, Optimal discrete distribution of heat flux elements for in-tube laminar forced convection, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 40 (2013) 89–96.
  40. ^ M. R. Hajmohammadi, M. R. Salimpour, M. Saber and A. Campo, Detailed analysis for the cooling performance enhancement of a heat source under a thick plate, Energy Conversion and Management, 76 (2013) 691–700
  41. ^ M. R. Hajmohammadi, S. Poozesh and R. Hosseini, Radiation effect on constructal design analysis of a T-Y-shaped assembly of fins, Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 7 (2012) 677-692.
  42. ^ M. R. Errera and C. A. Marin, A Comparison Between Random and Deterministic Dynamics of River Drainage Basins Formation, Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering), Vol. 8, n. 01, 65-71 (2009).
  43. ^ R. A. Hart and A. K. da Silva, Experimental thermal-hydraulic evaluation of constructal microfluidic structures under fully constrained conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 54, 3661-3671 (2011).
  44. ^ R. A. Hart, M. J. V. Ponkala and A. K. da Silva, Development and testing of a constructal microchannel flow system with dynamically controlled complexity. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 54, 5470-5480 (2011).
  45. ^ Z. Fan, X. Zhou, L. Luo and W. Yuan, Experimental investigation of the flow distribution of a 2-dimensional constructal distributor. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 33, 77−83 (2008).
  46. ^ K.-H. Cho, W.-P. Chang and M.-H. Kim, A numerical and experimental study to evaluate performance of vascularized cooling plates. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 32, 1186-1198 (2011).
  47. ^ D. Haller, P. Woias and N. Kockmann, Simulation and experimental investigation of pressure loss and heat transfer in microchannel networks containing bends and T-junctions. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 52, 2678−2689 (2009).
  48. ^ L. Chen, Progress in study on constructal theory and its applications. Science China, Technological Sciences 55 (3), 802-820 (2012).
  49. ^ Kleidon, A (2009). “Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in the Earth system: Applications and implications.” Naturwissenschaften, 96, 653-677.
  50. ^ Kleidon, A; Malhi, Y; Cox PM (2010) “Maximum entropy production in environmental and ecological systems.” Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 365, 1297–1302.
  51. ^ Dewar, R (2003). “Information theory explanation of the fluctuation theorem, maximum entropy production and self-organized criticality in non-equilibrium stationary states.” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 36, 631-641.
  52. ^ Dewar, RC (2005). “Maximum entropy production and the fluctuation theorem.” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38, L371-L381.
  53. ^ Bejan, A (2006). “Constructal theory of pattern formation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 3, 1773-1807.
  54. ^ a b Bejan, A. (2010). Design in nature, thermodynamics, and the constructal law. Comment on “Life, hierarchy, and the thermodynamic machinery of planet Earth” by A. Kelidon, Physics of Life Reviews Vol. 7, No. 4: 467-470.
  55. ^ L. A. O. Rocha, Constructal law: from the law of physics to applications and conferences. Phys Life Rev 8, 245-246 (2011).
  56. ^ a b c Bejan, A & Lorente, S. (2011). “The constructal law and the evolution of design in nature,” Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 3: 209-240
  57. ^ A. Bejan and S. Lorente, Constructal law of design and evolution: Physics, biology, technology, and society, Journal of Applied Physics 113, 151301 (2013); doi: 10.1063/1.4798429.
  58. ^ Bejan, A; Lorente, S (2004). The Constructal Law and the Thermodynamics of Flow Systems with Configuration. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 47: 3203–3214
  59. ^ Bejan, Adrian; Zane, Peder (January 24, 2012). Design in Nature: How the Constructal Law Governs Evolution in Biology, Physics, Technology, and Social Organization. New York: Doubleday. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-307-744340. 

External links[edit]

Popular literature[edit]

  • Maggie Wittlin, "A Finger on the Pulse of the World", SEED Magazine, January 13, 2006.
  • H. Poirier, Une théorie explique l’intelligence de la nature, Science & Vie, 1034, 2003, pp. 44–63.
  • Natural Design with Constructal Theory, Mechanical Engineering magazine, [6]
  • The many and the few, Mechanical Engineering magazine, [7]
  • Laufen = Fliegen = Schwimmen, [8]
  • Jeremy Berlin, Gaudi’s Materspiece, National Geographic, December 2010, pp. 24–27.
  • Tara Bruno, Higher Navel, faster feet, Science World, October 18, 2010, Vol. 67, No. 3, p. 5.
  • A. Boyle, Why March Madness isn’t that mad, MSNBC, 2 March 2011.
  • Jonathan Mitchell, Constructal Law: A Theory of Everything, Studio 360, 2 March 2012.
  • S. Pappas, Fastest swimmers make webbed hands out of water, Live Science, 20 June 2012.
  • M. Torre, “La Natura, vi svelo le formule della perfezione”, La Macchina del Tempo, January – February 2004, No. 1–2, Year 5, pp. 36–46.
  • “La Tour Eiffel a livré son equation”, Interview with A. Bejan, Science & Vie, No. 1050, March 2005, pp. 18–19.
  • “Evolution of Movement Design is Deterministic”, Interview with A. Bejan, Astrobiology Magazine, 31 December 2005. http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1820
  • “Traquers de formes: Quand les morphologues réinventent la nature” (Pursuers of shapes: when the morphologists reinvent nature), Science & Vie, No. 1067, August 2006, Supplement, pp. 47–50.
  • R. Bliwise, “Going With the Flow”, DUKE Magazine, September–October 2007, pp. 32–29.
  • P. J. Zane, Going with the flow, The News & Observer, Raleigh, 30 December 2007.
  • J. J. Hermes, “Fixed Rankings?”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 54, Issue 27, Page A6, 14 March 2008.
  • Fabienne Lemarchand, La pyramide ou la géometrie du moindre effort (The Pyramid or the geometry of least effort), Les Cahiers de Science & Vie, No. 106, August–September 2008, pp. 52–61.
  • R. R. Britt, Is Einstein the last great genius? Yahoo News, 5 December 2008, http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20081205/sc_livescience/iseinsteinthelastgreatgenius
  • M. Lord, Capstone Redesign, Prism, April 2009, pp. 45–47.
  • K. McVeigh, “The bigger they get, the faster they go – the rise of the superhuman athlete”, The Guardian, 17 July 2009.
  • R. Alleyne, “Size matters: bigger athletes dwarf efforts of smaller rivals”, The Daily Telegraph, 17 July 2009.
  • Elizabeth Cooney, “The quickest grow fastest”, The Boston Globe, 20 July 2009.
  • “Higher, taller, faster: study suggests”, Vancouver Sun, 20 July 2009.
  • R. Boswell, “The skinny on today’s Olympic athletes”, National Post, Canada, 20 July 2009.
  • Lee Dye, “Are giants taking over sports?”, ABC News, 22 July 2009.
  • Emanuela di Pasqua, “Generazione di fenomeni <<crescono>>”, Corriere della Sera, 17 July 2009.
  • Paola Mariano, Nuoto e corsa/ Atleti più veloci? La causa e il fisico “ingigantito”, ilsussidiario.net, 17 June 2009.
  • Elizabeth Landau, Olympic speed winners getting taller, heavier, CNN.com, 5 August 2009.
  • Matthew Futterman, Behind the NFL’s touchdown binge, The Wall Street Journal, 10 September 2009, p. D8.
  • Steve Connor, Why some shapes are more pleasing to the eye than others, The Independent, London, UK, 21 December 2009.
  • Karen McVeigh, Why golden ratio pleases the eye: US academic says he knows art secret, The Guardian, London, UK, 28 December 2009.
  • Paola Mariano, Cervello: nei nostri occhi il segreto bellezza opere d’arte, l’Unità, Italy, 21 December 2009.
  • Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Così occhio e mente cologno la bellezza, Corriere della Sera, 12 January 2010, p. 36.
  • Frédérique Doyon, Le secret de la beauté démystifié, Le Devoir, Montreal, 21 January 2010.
  • Matthew Moore, Centre of gravity theory for dominance of black sprinters and white swimmers, The Daily Telegraph, 12 July 2010.
  • Karin Zeitvogel, Belly-buttons key to success in sport: study, Yahoo News, 12 July 2010.
  • Karen Rowan, Scientists theorize why black athletes run fastest, Live Science, 13 July 2010.
  • William Saletan, Lose the race. Can the black-white performance gap be hereditary but not racial? Slate, 13 July 2010.
  • Jeannine Stein, The key to an athlete’s speed may be the body’s center of gravity, Los Angeles Times, Health, 12 July 2010.
  • L. Valich, Just go with the flow to pick March Madness winners, Medill Reports, 1 March 2011.
  • E. Brennan, Circular evolution in the NCAA tournament, ESPN, 3 March 2011.
  • C. Arnold, Universal Law of Basketball, US News & World Report, 21 March 2011.
  • Lindsey Emery, Athletic blessings in disguise, ESPN W, 11 May 2011
  • Pourquoi les coureurs d’origine africaine sont-ils meilleurs que les autres?, Science et Vie, July 2011, pp. 126–129.
  • Esses are everywhere, Science Daily, 20 July 2011.
  • Seeing the S-curve in everything, Science Codex, 20 July 2011.
  • A. W. Kosner, There’s a new law in physics and it changes everything, Forbes, 29 February 2012.
  • A. W. Kosner, “Freedom is good for design”, How to use Constructal Theory to liberate any flow system, Forbes, 18 March 2012.
  • Moira Gunn, TechNation: Adrian Bejan—The Nature of Design, IT Conversations, 22 March 2012.
  • A. Bejan and J. P. Zane, In design, nature goes with the flow, News & Observer, 8 May 2012.
  • Sharon Begley, Newton at the Games: Sports science, Reuters, 16 July 2012.
  • Sharon Begley, Faster Olympic swimmers paddle like a duck, kick like a dolphin, Reuters, 18 July 2012.
  • Matthew Futterman, Bodies built for Gold, The Wall Street Journal, 27 July 2012.
  • Natalie Wolchover, What are the ingredients of an Olympian?, Life’s Little Mysteries, 30 July 2012.
  • Pauline Gravel, La physique constructale à l′épreuve de l′eau?, Le Devoir, Montreal, 31 July 2012.
  • Karin Zeitvogel, SPORTS: Researchers point to fingers as key to speed in the water, WaterWonksBeta, 2 August 2012.
  • Lee Charles Kelley and Kevin Behan, Empathy & evolution: how dogs convert stress into flow, Psychology Today, 6 August 2012.
  • Michael Donlevy, Could your child be an Olympian?, Yano, 15 August 2012.
  • A. W. Kosner, Big data not required: the benefits of a less complex model of climate change, Forbes, 12 October 2012.
  • L. C. Kelley, The canine mind bows to the Constructal Law, Psychology Today 16 October 2012.
  • The Week, UK, The Hobbit film leaves fans with an unexpected thickness, 2 December 2012.
  • Max Borders, The most important idea you probably didn’t know about, The Freeman, 31 January 2013.
  • A. W. Kosner, The (not so) evil strategy behind everything Google, Forbes, 3 February 2013.
  • L. C. Kelly, Hierarchies without dominance: The pack as a flow system?, Psychology Today, 8 February 2013.
  • Lance Hosey, Why We Love Beautiful Things, New York Times, 15 February 2013.
  • Phil Patton, Designers of Aston-Martin Rapide S Embrace Golden Ratio, New York Times, 20 February 2013.
  • A. W. Kosner, The Sports Car, The Laptop And The Science Behind The Golden Proportion, Forbes, 22 February 2013.
  • Matthew Futterman, Here Come The Flamethrowers, The Wall Street Journal, 29 March 2013, pp. D1-D2.
  • Ira Katz A Law for Almost Everything, American Daily Herald, 3 June 2013.
  • Richard Merritt, In baseball, bigger is better, 8 July 2013 http://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-07/du-ibb070813.php.
  • Laura Candler, Why baseball pitchers (and other athletes) are getting taller, WUNC Science and Technology, 10 July 2013.
  • Through the Wormhole, with Morgan Freeman: Did God Create Evolution?, Science Channel, 31 July 2013.
  • Karl Gruber, Spreading your fingers improves your swimming, The Munich Eye, 9 September 2013.
  • A. W. Kosner, Winter wonderland: Snowflakes are predictably diverse, but not unique, Forbes, 22 December 2013.
  • Stephanie Pappas, How snowflakes form: new video explains, Live Science, 23 December 2013.
  • Matthew Futterman, Imperfect bodies chase gold, The Wall Street Journal, 7 February 2014.