Eco-efficiency
The term eco-efficiency was coined by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) in its 1992 publication "Changing Course". It is based on the concept of creating more goods and services while using fewer resources and creating less waste and pollution.
The 1992 Earth Summit endorsed eco-efficiency as a means for companies to implement Agenda 21 in the private sector, and the term has become synonymous with a management philosophy geared towards sustainability.
According to the WBCSD definition, eco-efficiency is achieved through the delivery of "competitively priced goods and services that satisfy human needs and bring quality of life while progressively reducing environmental impacts of goods and resource intensity throughout the entire life-cycle to a level at least in line with the Earth's estimated carrying capacity."
This concept describes a vision for the production of economically valuable goods and services while reducing the ecological impacts of production. In other words eco-efficiency means producing more with less.
According to the WBCSD, critical aspects of eco-efficiency are:[1]
- A reduction in the material intensity of goods or services;
- A reduction in the energy intensity of goods or services;
- Reduced dispersion of toxic materials;
- Improved recyclability;
- Maximum use of renewable resources;
- Greater durability of products;
- Increased service intensity of goods and services.
The reduction in ecological impacts translates into an increase in resource productivity, which in turn can create a competitive advantage.
Strategies that have been linked to eco-efficiency include “Factor 4” and “Factor 10”, which call for specific reductions in resource use, “natural capitalism”, which incorporates eco-efficiency as part of a broader strategy, and the “cradle-to-cradle” movement, which claims to go beyond eco-efficiency in abolishing the very idea of waste. According to Boulanger,[2] all versions of eco-efficiency share four key characteristics:
- Confidence in technological innovation as the main solution to un-sustainability;
- Reliance on business as the principal actor of transformation. The emphasis is on firms designing new products, shifting to new production processes, and investing in R&D, etc., more than on the retailer or the consumer, let alone the citizen.
- Trust in markets (if they are functioning well);
- “Growthphilia”: there is nothing wrong with growth as such. Moreover, with “cradle-to-cradle”, growth is conducive to sustainability per se.
Contents |
[edit] See also
- Eco-innovation
- Sustainable Design
- Source reduction
- Industrial Ecology
- Sustainable Value
- Material input per service unit
[edit] References
- ^ Lovins, L. Hunter (2008). Rethinking production in State of the World 2008, p. 34.
- ^ Boulanger, P.M. (2010) “Three strategies for sustainable consumption”. S.A.P.I.EN.S. 3 (2)
[edit] Further reading
- WBCSD (2000). Eco-Efficiency: Creating more value with less impact. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. ISBN 2-94-024017-5. http://www.wbcsd.org/plugins/DocSearch/details.asp?type=DocDet&ObjectId=Mjc5/.
- WBCSD (2000). Measuring Eco-Efficiency: A guide to reporting company performance. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. ISBN 2-94-024014-0. http://www.wbcsd.org/plugins/DocSearch/details.asp?type=DocDet&ObjectId=Mjgy/.
- McDonough, William; Michael Braungart (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press. ISBN 0-86-547587-3.
