Empire (Negri and Hardt book)
|Author||Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri|
|Subject||Globalization, international relations|
|Published||2000 (Harvard University Press)|
|ISBN||ISBN 0-674-25121-0 (hardcover) ISBN 0-674-00671-2 (paperback)|
|LC Class||JC359 .H279 2000|
|Preceded by||Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State-Form|
|Followed by||Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire|
In general, the book theorizes an ongoing transition from a "modern" phenomenon of imperialism, centered around individual nation-states, to an emergent postmodern construct created among ruling powers which the authors call "Empire" (the capital letter is distinguishing), with different forms of warfare:
...according to Hardt and Negri's Empire, the rise of Empire is the end of national conflict, the "enemy" now, whoever he is, can no longer be ideological or national. The enemy now must be understood as a kind of criminal, as someone who represents a threat not to a political system or a nation but to the law. This is the enemy as a terrorist....In the "new order that envelops the entire space of... civilization", where conflict between nations has been made irrelevant, the "enemy" is simultaneously "banalized" (reduced to an object of routine police repression) and absolutized (as the Enemy, an absolute threat to the ethical order").
Empire elaborates a variety of ideas surrounding constitutions, global war, and class. Hence, the Empire is constituted by a monarchy (the United States and the G8, and international organizations such as NATO, the International Monetary Fund or the World Trade Organization), an oligarchy (the multinational corporations and other nation-states) and a democracy (the various non-government organizations and the United Nations). Part of the book's analysis deals with "imagin[ing] resistance", but "the point of Empire is that it, too, is "total" and that resistance to it can only take the form of negation - "the will to be against". The Empire is total, but economic inequality persists, and as all identities are wiped out and replaced with a universal one, the identity of the poor persists.
This description of pyramidal levels is a replica of Polybius' description of Roman government, hence the denomination "Empire". Furthermore, the crisis is conceived as inherent to the Empire. Negri & Hardt are also heavily indebted to Michel Foucault's analysis of biopolitics and Gilles Deleuze's philosophy. Before Empire, Negri was best known for having written The Savage Anomaly (1981), a milestone book in Spinozism studies which he wrote in prison. Empire is thus, unsurprisingly, also influenced by Spinoza.
The ideas first introduced in Empire (notably the concept of multitude, taken from Spinoza) were further developed in the 2004 books Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire and the 2009 book Commonwealth, which were also written by Negri and Hardt.
|This section requires expansion. (January 2011)|
Empire has created important intellectual debates around its arguments. Certain scholars have compared the evolution of the world order with Hardt and Negri's world image in Empire. A number of publications and debates centered around the book, Hardt and Negri's theoretical approach has also been compared and contrasted with works of 'the global capitalism school' whose authors have analyzed transnational capitalism and class relations in the global epoch.
- Ed Vulliamy, "Empire hits back," The Observer (July 15, 2001). Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, Empire (Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: Harvard University Press, 2000), pg 6.
- Walter Benn Michaels, The Shape of the Signifier: 1967 to the end of history (Princeton University Press, 2004), pg 171-172.
- Walter Benn Michaels, The Shape of the Signifier: 1967 to the end of history (Princeton University Press, 2004), pg 173.
- "The problem, as they see it, is that "postmodernist authors" have neglected the one identity that should matter most to those on the left, the one we have always with us: "The only non-localizable 'common name' of pure difference in all eras is that of the poor" (156)...only the poor, Hardt and Negri say, "live radically the actual and present being" (157)." Walter Benn Michaels, The Shape of the Signifier: 1967 to the end of history (Princeton University Press, 2004), pg 179-180.
- "Indeed, it is the irrelevance of political beliefs or ideas and their replacement by what (thinking to follow Foucault) Hardt and Negri call the "biopolitical", that mark the special contribution of the discourse of terrorism, which we might more generally call the discourse of globalization." Walter Benn Michaels, The Shape of the Signifier: 1967 to the end of history (Princeton University Press, 2004), pg 173.
- As a sample of those debates in the academic circles, look at this article: Mehmet Akif Okur, "Rethinking Empire After 9/11: Towards A New Ontological Image of World Order," Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, Volume XII, Winter 2007, pp.61-93. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- such as in Dean and Passavant edited volume, "Empire's New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri," Routledge, 2003.
- On this see: Jeb Sprague, "Empire, Global Capitalism, and Theory: Reconsidering Hardt and Negri," "Current Perspectives in Social Theory", 2011, Vol. 29. P. 187-207.
- Walter Benn Michaels, The Shape of the Signifier: 1967 to the end of history (Princeton University Press, 2004), 224 pages, ISBN 0-691-11872-8.
|Wikiquote has quotations related to: Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri|
- Full text of Empire, angelfire.com
- Full text of Empire, libcom.org
- Reviews of Hardt and Negri's Empire
- (2000) Gopal Balakrishnan, "Hardt & Negri's Empire," New Left Review 5 (September–October 2000). Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- Malcolm Bull, "You can't build a new society with a Stanley knife," London Review of Books, Vol. 23, No. 19 (4 October 2001), pages 3–7. Review. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2001) Slavoj Žižek, "Have Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri Rewritten the Communist manifesto for the Twenty-First Century?," Rethinking Marxism, No. 3/4 (2001). Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2002) Takis Fotopoulos (co-written with Alexandros Gezerlis), "Hardt and Negri's Empire: a new Communist Manifesto or a reformist welcome to neoliberal globalisation?," Democracy & Nature: The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy, Vol. 8, No. 2 (July 2002). Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2003) Pietro Di Nardo, "The Empire does not exist: a critique of Toni Negri's ideas," In Defence of Marxism (15 January 2003). A Marxist critique of the book. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2003) Maria Turchetto, "The Empire Strikes Back: On Hardt and Negri," Historical Materialism, volume 11:1 (2003), p. 23–36. A marxist critique of Empire. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2003) Jodi Dean and Paul Passavant, "Empire's New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri," Routledge.
- (2003) Crisso and Odoteo, "Barbarians: the disordered insurgence," (2003). An anarchist critique of Empire. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2007) Slavoj Žižek, "Blows Against the Empire?," lacan.com (2007). Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2007) Mehmet Akif Okur, "Rethinking Empire After 9/11: Towards A New Ontological Image of World Order", Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, Volume XII (Winter 2007), pp. 61–93. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
- (2011) Jeb Sprague, "Empire, Global Capitalism, and Theory: Reconsidering Hardt and Negri," "Current Perspectives in Social Theory", 2011, Vol. 29. P. 187-207.