Ethical persuasion
| This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2009) |
| This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions may be available. (December 2009) |
Ethical persuasion is a human being's internal ability to treat others with respect, understanding, caring, and fairness in order to understand themselves and others. There are three phases of ethical persuasion and they are:
- Explore the other person's viewpoint.
- Explain your viewpoint.
- Create resolutions.
The ethics of rhetoric is mainly concerned with morality and a persons ability to not be tempted in certain instances into helping themselves by negatively impacting others, or just as unethical to use persuasion to increase personal gain without the knowledge of the audience.
For example, in any organization, where the clients, without any technical knowledge, are motivated by self-direction, set goals which are very difficult to reach than they had initially imagined. If one encounters such clients, his/her first ethical obligation is to engage the client in a detailed discussion about feasibility. Here, Ethical Persuasion involves exploring alternatives and a review of the merits and demerits of the decisions.
[edit] Foundations for arguments
According to Richard Weaver the main components of a persuasive argument stem from three different argument types.
- Genus - based around the “nature” of things and their general attributes
- Similtude - concerns using associated ideas and principals
- Circumstance - includes neither one of these philosophies and does not concern individual values or beliefs, but rather necessity and immediate logic.
| This sociology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |