Holdout problem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Securities
Vereinigte Ostindische Compagnie bond.jpg

Securities
Bond
Equities
Investment Fund
Derivatives
Structured finance
Agency securities

Markets
Bond market
Stock market
Futures market
Foreign exchange market
Commodity market
Spot market
Over-the-counter Market (OTC)

Bonds
Bonds by coupon
Fixed rate bond
Floating rate note
Zero-coupon bond
Inflation-indexed bond
Commercial paper
Perpetual bond

Bonds by issuer
Corporate bond
Government bond
Municipal bond
Pfandbrief
Sovereign bonds

Equities (Stocks)
Stock
Share
IPO
Short Selling

Investment Funds
Mutual fund
Index Fund
Exchange-traded fund (ETF)
Closed-end fund
Segregated fund
Hedge fund

Structured finance
Securitization
Asset-backed security
Mortgage-backed security
Commercial mortgage-backed security
Residential mortgage-backed security

Tranching
Collateralized debt obligation
Collateralized fund obligation
Collateralized mortgage obligation

Credit-linked note
Unsecured bond
Agency Securities

Derivatives
Options
Warrants
Futures
Forwards
Swaps
Credit Derivatives
Hybrid Securities

[Template:Securities&action=edit edit this box]

When a government offers an exchange offer, in an effort to restructure its sovereign debt, some bond holders may reject it. Bondholders are so widely diversified that the coordination of bondholders has become very difficult. In what some (usually with socialist, liberal or leftist political leanings) call "selfish" behavior, some bondholders then reject the exchange offer and seek the full payment of original bonds, as is their entitlement, but in so doing disrupt the restructuring process. This is normally referred to as the holdout problem.

This creates an unequal situation between holders of new bonds and those of existing bonds. In addition it may delay the restructuring process and ultimately reduce the resource and capacity of the country to avoid repaying its debt or to raise new loans.

There have been recent holdout problems in Peru (1996) and Argentina (2001). In the case of Peru, "buying out" holdouts has had a cost. The holdout problem may become more prevalent in future, as successful litigation by some creditors in one case may increase the incentives for others to try it. In addition, the possibility that holdout creditors can attach future payments on restructured debt and receive better treatment than cooperating creditors distorts incentives and can derail efforts for a cooperative restructuring. It is likely to be of particular importance in cases in which the creditors are being asked to accept substantial debt and debt service reduction.

[edit] External links