Human rights in the Soviet Union: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

20 April 2024

1 April 2024

8 March 2024

29 February 2024

28 February 2024

31 January 2024

25 January 2024

24 January 2024

19 January 2024

  • curprev 10:2210:22, 19 January 2024Czello talk contribs 37,974 bytes +582 Restored revision 1177827673 by Philomathes2357 (talk): This has been discussed before and there has not been a consensus that he's unreliable. Saying he's conservative isn't good enough undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 10:2010:20, 19 January 20241.146.5.149 talk 37,392 bytes −582 Robert Conquest Is an unreliable as his political views were conservative, and some argue that this bias influenced his interpretation of historical events. And in some cases, Conquest relied on anecdotal evidence, memoirs, and unverified sources to support his arguments. Robert Conquest was also known to inflate his numbers in his various books to gain more public attention in persuit of money therefore his inclution in this article is unsuitable. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

29 September 2023

  • curprev 21:0321:03, 29 September 2023Philomathes2357 talk contribs 37,974 bytes −24 removed POV tag. The only people who support the tag are those making vague allusions to the "positive human rights" of the Soviet Union, but no sources have been produced to enumerate those "positive human rights". undo

6 September 2023

  • curprev 21:3721:37, 6 September 2023Czello talk contribs 37,998 bytes +1,123 Restored revision 1174015536 by Czello (talk): That's not how RS works - please discuss on the talk page undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 19:4219:42, 6 September 2023Kalivyah talk contribs 36,875 bytes −1,123 It indeed does. A source cannot be considered to be reliable if it does not cite a source itself, or if the source that it actually cited did not even say what the initial claim was. If I am to link to a random website or article which provides no sources of its own, does that make it a valid source? No. I would suggest you to research into the sources I specifically removed, just as I did. You will find that they either do not source anything, or that the page they do cite is irrelevant to it. undo Tags: Undo Reverted references removed

5 September 2023

  • curprev 19:5819:58, 5 September 2023Czello talk contribs 37,998 bytes +1,123 Restored revision 1173259542 by Cloud200 (talk): A source not then citing another source in turn doesn't justify removal undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
  • curprev 19:5519:55, 5 September 2023Kalivyah talk contribs 36,875 bytes −1,123 An examination of the source for Pipe's claim on "trials being pre-decided" was examined and found to have cited no source, and as such has been removed. Blatant journalistic source from a "Oleg Pshenichnyi" on a website not part of Wikipedia's "trusted sources" has been removed. I would recommend other editors look into Richard Pipes' sources more closely considering this is the second time I've had to remove a source from him for citing fundamentally nothing/poor sources. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

1 September 2023

31 August 2023

  • curprev 21:0221:02, 31 August 2023Kalivyah talk contribs 36,801 bytes +326 See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Human_rights_in_the_Soviet_Union#%22Right_to_private_property%22. Added stuff regarding the Soviet famines in #Economic rights. A re-examination of the source which claimed that Lenin said [sic] "the purpose of socialist courts was 'not to eliminate terror ... but to substantiate it and legitimize it in principle.'" has shown that both sources are faulty: see p. 356/357 of "Geist und Gesicht", the presumed source of the quote- which makes no mention of it undo

25 August 2023

7 August 2023

2 June 2023

24 April 2023

12 April 2023

13 March 2023

13 February 2023

4 February 2023

29 December 2022

  • curprev 03:3803:38, 29 December 2022Sunrise talk contribs 35,711 bytes +18 Misc edits: improved wording/descriptions, grammar, rearrangements for more logical order, rmv a couple things that are repetitive or off-topic. Copied a few statements to lead. Edits to quotes are corrections from original or improvements to translations. undo

22 December 2022

28 June 2022

4 April 2022

30 March 2022

1 March 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)