Infantry tactics: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 March 2024

5 March 2024

23 February 2023

16 January 2023

4 November 2022

3 June 2022

21 January 2022

20 June 2021

  • curprev 11:3511:35, 20 June 202195.12.55.4 talk 53,118 bytes −15 →‎Middle Ages: "Missiliers" A word such as this is not given in Oxford dictionary. It never mentioned on Google Books, any academical paper, and websearch gives no result. There is a "Missileer" on the other hand. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_combat_crew Which has absolutely nothing to do with Missile weapon users of middle age. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:2411:24, 20 June 202195.12.55.4 talk 53,133 bytes −17 →‎Mountain warfare: Repetation, unnecessary use of words. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:2011:20, 20 June 202195.12.55.4 talk 53,150 bytes +20 →‎Napoleonic: Word repetation. Used a synonym. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:1211:12, 20 June 202195.12.55.4 talk 53,130 bytes +3 →‎Middle Ages: Development as it given in this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halberd "The halberd was inexpensive to produce and very versatile in battle. As the halberd was eventually refined, its point was more fully developed to allow it to better deal with spears and pikes (and make it able to push back approaching horsemen), as was the hook opposite the axe head, which could be used to pull horsemen to the ground" Instead of "creation" because the very same page mentions it's exi... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:0111:01, 20 June 202195.12.55.4 talk 53,127 bytes −100 →‎Middle Ages: I have noticed that this part is shoe-horned into the paragraph afterwards as it does not fit in terms of textual integrity. It is immature to include such a comical and dubious concept without mentioning it's mythical and questionable nature. And not providing any source. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 April 2021

24 February 2021

29 January 2021

12 November 2020

10 November 2020

24 September 2020

23 July 2020

21 July 2020

16 June 2020

2 June 2020

22 April 2020

19 April 2020

5 November 2019

6 October 2019

2 August 2019

29 January 2019

29 October 2018

28 July 2018

12 May 2018

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)