Steinhaus–Moser notation
In mathematics, Steinhaus–Moser notation is a means of expressing certain extremely large numbers. It is an extension of Steinhaus’s polygon notation.
Contents |
[edit] Definitions
etc.: n written in an (m + 1)-sided polygon is equivalent with "the number n inside n nested m-sided polygons". In a series of nested polygons, they are associated inward. The number n inside two triangles is equivalent to nn inside one triangle, which is equivalent to nn raised to the power of nn.
Steinhaus only defined the triangle, the square, and a circle
, equivalent to the pentagon defined above.
[edit] Special values
Steinhaus defined:
- mega is the number equivalent to 2 in a circle: ②
- megiston is the number equivalent to 10 in a circle: ⑩
Moser’s number is the number represented by "2 in a megagon", where a megagon is a polygon with "mega" sides.
Alternative notations:
- use the functions square(x) and triangle(x)
- let M(n, m, p) be the number represented by the number n in m nested p-sided polygons; then the rules are:
- M(n,1,3) = nn
- M(n,1,p + 1) = M(n,n,p)
- M(n,m + 1,p) = M(M(n,1,p),m,p)
- and
-
- mega = M(2,1,5)
- moser = M(2,1,M(2,1,5))
[edit] Mega
A mega, ②, is already a very large number, since ② = square(square(2)) = square(triangle(triangle(2))) = square(triangle(22)) = square(triangle(4)) = square(44) = square(256) = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256)...))) [256 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256256)...))) [255 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(3.2 × 10616)...))) [255 triangles] = ...
Using the other notation:
mega = M(2,1,5) = M(256,256,3)
With the function f(x) = xx we have mega = f256(256) = f258(2) where the superscript denotes a functional power, not a numerical power.
We have (note the convention that powers are evaluated from right to left):
- M(256,2,3) =

- M(256,3,3) =
≈
Similarly:
- M(256,4,3) ≈

- M(256,5,3) ≈

etc.
Thus:
- mega =
, where
denotes a functional power of the function f(n) = 256n.
Rounding more crudely (replacing the 257 at the end by 256), we get mega ≈
, using Knuth's up-arrow notation.
After the first few steps the value of nn is each time approximately equal to 256n. In fact, it is even approximately equal to 10n (see also approximate arithmetic for very large numbers). Using base 10 powers we get:

(log 10616 is added to the 616)
(619 is added to the
, which is negligible; therefore just a 10 is added at the bottom)
...
- mega =
, where
denotes a functional power of the function f(n) = 10n. Hence 
[edit] Moser's number
It has been proven that in Conway chained arrow notation,
and, in Knuth's up-arrow notation,
Therefore Moser's number, although incomprehensibly large, is vanishingly small compared to Graham's number:
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- Robert Munafo's Large Numbers
- Factoid on Big Numbers
- Megistron at mathworld.wolfram.com
- Circle notation at mathworld.wolfram.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||

≈


, where
denotes a functional power of the function 
(
(
, which is negligible; therefore just a 10 is added at the bottom)
, where
denotes a functional power of the function 


