Jump to content

Mountain pass theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OAbot (talk | contribs) at 13:49, 6 July 2021 (Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The mountain pass theorem is an existence theorem from the calculus of variations, originally due to Antonio Ambrosetti and Paul Rabinowitz.[1] Given certain conditions on a function, the theorem demonstrates the existence of a saddle point. The theorem is unusual in that there are many other theorems regarding the existence of extrema, but few regarding saddle points.

Statement

The assumptions of the theorem are:

  • is a functional from a Hilbert space H to the reals,
  • and is Lipschitz continuous on bounded subsets of H,
  • satisfies the Palais–Smale compactness condition,
  • ,
  • there exist positive constants r and a such that if , and
  • there exists with such that .

If we define:

and:

then the conclusion of the theorem is that c is a critical value of I.

Visualization

The intuition behind the theorem is in the name "mountain pass." Consider I as describing elevation. Then we know two low spots in the landscape: the origin because , and a far-off spot v where . In between the two lies a range of mountains (at ) where the elevation is high (higher than a>0). In order to travel along a path g from the origin to v, we must pass over the mountains—that is, we must go up and then down. Since I is somewhat smooth, there must be a critical point somewhere in between. (Think along the lines of the mean-value theorem.) The mountain pass lies along the path that passes at the lowest elevation through the mountains. Note that this mountain pass is almost always a saddle point.

For a proof, see section 8.5 of Evans.

Weaker formulation

Let be Banach space. The assumptions of the theorem are:

  • and have a Gateaux derivative which is continuous when and are endowed with strong topology and weak* topology respectively.
  • There exists such that one can find certain with
.
  • satisfies weak Palais–Smale condition on .

In this case there is a critical point of satisfying . Moreover, if we define

then

For a proof, see section 5.5 of Aubin and Ekeland.

References

  1. ^ Ambrosetti, Antonio; Rabinowitz, Paul H. (1973). "Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications". Journal of Functional Analysis. 14 (4): 349–381. doi:10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7.

Further reading