Banach space
In mathematics, more specifically in functional analysis, a Banach space (pronounced [ˈbanax]) is a complete normed vector space. Informally, a Banach space is a vector space with a metric that allows the computation of vector length and distance between vectors and is complete in the sense that a Cauchy sequence of vectors always converges to a well defined limit in the space.
Banach spaces are named after the Polish mathematician Stefan Banach, who introduced and made a systematic study of them in 1920–1922 along with Hans Hahn and Eduard Helly.[1] Banach spaces originally grew out of the study of function spaces by Hilbert, Fréchet, and Riesz earlier in the century. Banach spaces play a central role in functional analysis. In other areas of analysis, the spaces under study are often Banach spaces.
Contents |
Definition[edit]
A Banach space is a vector space X over the field R of real numbers, or over the field C of complex numbers, which is equipped with a norm and which is complete with respect to that norm, that is to say, for every Cauchy sequence
in X, there exists an element x in X such that
.
The vector space structure allows one to relate the behavior of Cauchy sequences to that of converging series of vectors. A normed space X is a Banach space if and only if each absolutely convergent series in X converges,[2]
Completeness of a normed space is preserved if the given norm is replaced by an equivalent one.
All norms on a finite dimensional vector space are equivalent. Every finite-dimensional normed space is a Banach space.[3]
General theory[edit]
Linear operators, isomorphisms[edit]
If X and Y are normed spaces over the same ground field K, the set of all continuous K-linear maps T : X → Y is denoted by B(X, Y). In infinite-dimensional spaces, not all linear maps are continuous. A linear mapping from a normed space X to another normed space is continuous if and only if it is bounded on the closed unit ball of X. Thus, the vector space B(X, Y) can be given the operator norm
When Y a Banach space, the space B(X, Y) is a Banach space with respect to this norm.
If X is a Banach space, the space B(X) = B(X, X) forms a unital Banach algebra; the multiplication operation is given by the composition of linear maps.
If X and Y are normed spaces, they are isomorphic normed spaces if there exists a linear bijection T from X onto Y such that T and its inverse T −1 are continuous. If one of the two spaces X or Y is complete (or reflexive, separable, etc.) then so is the other space. Two normed spaces X and Y are isometrically isomorphic if in addition, T is an isometry, i.e., ||T(x)|| = ||x|| for every x in X. The Banach-Mazur distance d(X, Y) between two isomorphic but not isometric spaces X and Y gives a measure of how much the two spaces X and Y differ.
Basic notions[edit]
Every normed space X can be isometrically embedded in a Banach space. More precisely, there is a Banach space Y and an isometric mapping T : X → Y such that T(X) is dense in Y. If Z is another Banach space such that there is an isometric isomorphism from X onto a dense subset of Z, then Z is isometrically isomorphic to Y.
This Banach space Y is the completion of the normed space X. The underlying metric space for Y is the same as the metric completion of X, with the vector space operations extended from X to Y. The completion of X is often denoted by
.
The cartesian product X×Y of two normed spaces is not canonically equipped with a norm. However, several equivalent norms are commonly used,[4] such as
and give rise to isomorphic normed spaces. In this sense, the product X×Y (or the direct sum X ⊕ Y) is complete if and only if the two factors are complete.
If M is a closed subspace of a normed space X, there is a natural norm on the quotient space X / M,
The quotient X / M is a Banach space when X is complete.[5] The quotient map from X onto X / M, sending x in X to its class x+M, is linear, onto and has norm 1, except when M = X, in which case the quotient is the null space.
The closed linear subspace M of X is said to be a complemented subspace of X if M is the range of a bounded linear projection P from X onto M. In this case, the space X is isomorphic to the direct sum of M and ker P, the kernel of the projection P.
Suppose that X and Y are Banach spaces and that T ∈ B(X, Y). There exists a canonical factorization of T as[5]
where the first map π is the quotient map, and the second map T1 sends every class x + Ker(T) in the quotient to the image T(x) in Y. This is well defined because all elements in the same class have the same image. The mapping T1 is a linear bijection from X / Ker T onto the range T(X), whose inverse need not be bounded.
Classical spaces[edit]
Basic examples[6] of Banach spaces include the Lp spaces and their special cases, the sequence spaces ℓp; the space C(K) of continuous scalar functions on a compact Hausdorff space K, equipped with the max norm,
According to the Banach–Mazur theorem, every Banach space is isometrically isomorphic to a subspace of some C(K).[7] For every separable Banach space X, there is a closed subspace M of ℓ1 such that X ≅ ℓ1/M.[8]
A most important example of Banach space is that of a Hilbert space. A Hilbert space H on K = R or C is complete for a norm of the form
is the inner product, a K-valued function on H × H, linear in x and such that
The space L2 is a fundamental example of Hilbert space.
The Hardy spaces, the Sobolev spaces are examples of Banach spaces that are related to Lp spaces and have additional structure. They are important in different branches of analysis, Harmonic analysis and Partial differential equations among others.
A Banach algebra is a Banach space A over K = R or C, together with a structure of algebra over K, such that the product map (a, b) ∈ A × A → a b ∈ A is continuous. An equivalent norm on A can be found so that ǁa bǁ ≤ ǁaǁ ǁbǁ for all a, b in A. The Banach space C(K), with the pointwise product, is a Banach algebra. The disk algebra A(D) consists of functions holomorphic in the open unit disk D in the complex plane and continuous on the closure of D. Equipped with the max norm on the closure of D, the disk algebra A(D) is a closed subalgebra of
. The Wiener algebra A(T) is the algebra of functions on the unit circle T with absolutely convergent Fourier series. Via the map associating a function on T to the sequence of its Fourier coefficients, this algebra is isomorphic to the Banach algebra ℓ1(Z), where the product is the convolution of sequences. For every Banach space X, the space B(X) of bounded linear operators on X, with the composition of maps as product, is a Banach algebra.
A C*-algebra is a complex Banach algebra A with an antilinear involution a → a* such that ǁa*aǁ = ǁaǁ2. The space B(H) of bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H is a fundamental example of C*-algebra. The Gelfand–Naimark theorem states that every C*-algebra is isometrically isomorphic to a C*-subalgebra of some B(H). The space C(K) of complex continuous functions on a compact Hausdorff space K is an example of commutative C*-algebra, where the involution associates to every function f its complex conjugate
.
Dual space[edit]
If X is a normed space and K the underlying field (either the real or the complex numbers), the continuous dual space is the space of continuous linear maps from X into K, or continuous linear functionals. The notation for the continuous dual is X ′ = B(X, K) in this article.[9] Since K is a Banach space (using the absolute value as norm), the dual X ′ is a Banach space, for every normed space X.
The main tool for proving the existence of continuous linear functionals is the Hahn–Banach theorem.
Hahn–Banach Theorem. Let X be a vector space over the field K = R or K = C. Let further
Then, there exists a linear functional F : X → K so that
- Y ⊆ X be a linear subspace,
- p : X → R be a sublinear function and
- f : Y → K be a linear functional so that Re f(y) ≤ p(y) for all y in Y.
In particular, every continuous linear functional on a subspace of a normed space can be continuously extended to the whole space, without increasing the norm of the functional.[10]
The Hahn–Banach separation theorem states that two disjoint non-empty convex sets in a real Banach space, one of them open, can be separated by a closed affine hyperplane. The open convex set lies strictly on one side of the hyperplane, the second convex set lies on the other side but may touch the hyperplane.[11]
A subset S in a Banach space X is total if the linear span of S is dense in X. The subset S is total in X if and only if the only continuous linear functional that vanishes on S is the 0 functional: this equivalence follows from the Hahn–Banach theorem.
If X is the direct sum of two closed linear subspaces M and N, then the dual X ′ of X is isomorphic to the direct sum of the duals of M and N.[12] If M is a closed linear subspace in X, one can associate the orthogonal of M in the dual,
The orthogonal M⊥ is a closed linear subspace of the dual. The dual of M is isometrically isomorphic to X ′ / M⊥. The dual of X / M is isometrically isomorphic to M⊥.[13]
The dual of a separable Banach space need not be separable, but:
When X ′ is separable, the above criterion for totality can be used for proving the existence of a countable total subset in X.
Weak topologies[edit]
The weak topology on a Banach space X is the coarsest topology on X for which all elements x ′ in the continuous dual space X ′ are continuous. The norm topology is therefore finer than the weak topology. However, a convex subset of a Banach space that is norm-closed is also weakly closed:[15] this follows from the Hahn-Banach separation theorem. A norm-continuous linear map between two Banach spaces X and Y is also weakly continuous, i.e., continuous from the weak topology of X to that of Y.[16]
If X is infinite-dimensional, there exist linear maps which are not continuous. The space X* of all linear maps from X to the underlying field K (this space X* is called the algebraic dual space, to distinguish it from X ′) also induces a topology on X which is finer than the weak topology, and much less used in functional analysis.
On a dual space X ′, there is a topology weaker than the weak topology of X ′, called weak* topology. It is the coarsest topology on X ′ for which all evaluation maps x′ ∈ X ′ → x′(x), x ∈ X, are continuous. Its importance comes from the Banach–Alaoglu theorem.
Banach–Alaoglu Theorem. Let X be a normed vector space. Then the closed unit ball B ′ = {x′ ∈ X ′ | ǁx′ ǁ ≤ 1} of the dual space is compact in the weak* topology.
The Banach–Alaoglu theorem depends on Tychonoff's theorem about infinite products of compact spaces. When X is separable, the unit ball B ′ of the dual is a metrizable compact in the weak* topology.[17]
Examples of dual spaces[edit]
The dual of c0 is isometrically isomorphic to ℓ1. The dual of Lp([0, 1]) is isometrically isomorphic to Lq([0, 1]) when 1 ≤ p < ∞ and 1/p + 1/q = 1.
For every vector y in a Hilbert space H, the mapping
defines a continuous linear functional f y on H. The Riesz representation theorem states that every continuous linear functional on H is of the form f y for a uniquely defined vector y in H. The mapping y ∈ H → f y is an antilinear isometric bijection from H onto its dual H ′. When the scalars are real, this map is an isometric isomorphism.
When K is a compact Hausdorff topological space, the dual M(K) of C(K) is the space of Radon measures in the sense of Bourbaki.[18] The subset P(K) of M(K) consisting of non-negative measures of mass 1 (probability measures) is a convex w*-closed subset of the unit ball of M(K). The extreme points of P(K) are the Dirac measures on K. The set of Dirac measures on K, equipped with the w*-topology, is homeomorphic to K.
Banach-Stone Theorem. If K and L are compact Hausdorff spaces and if C(K) and C(L) are isometrically isomorphic, then the topological spaces K and L are homeomorphic.[19][20]
The result has been extended by Amir[21] and Cambern[22] to the case when the multiplicative Banach–Mazur distance between C(K) and C(L) is < 2. The theorem is no longer true when the distance is equal to 2.[23]
In the commutative Banach algebra C(K), the maximal ideals are precisely kernels of Dirac mesures on K,
More generally, by the Gelfand-Mazur theorem, the maximal ideals of a unital commutative Banach algebra can be identified with its characters---not merely as sets but as topological spaces: the former with the hull-kernel topology and the latter with the w*-topology. In this identification, the maximal ideal space can be viewed as a w*-compact subset of the unit ball in the dual A ′.
Theorem. If K is a compact Hausdorff space, then the maximal ideal space Ξ of the Banach algebra C(K) is homeomorphic to K.[19]
Not every unital commutative Banach algebra is of the form C(K) for some compact Hausdorff space K. However, this statement holds if one places C(K) in the smaller category of commutative C*-algebras. Gelfand's representation theorem for commutative C*-algebras states that every commutative unital C*-algebra A is isometrically isomorphic to a C(K) space.[24] The Hausdorff compact space K here is again the maximal ideal space, also called the spectrum of A in the C*-algebra context.
Banach's theorems[edit]
Here are the main general results about Banach spaces that go back to the time of Banach's book (Banach (1932) and are related to the Baire category theorem. According to this theorem, a complete metric space (such as a Banach space, a Fréchet space or an F-space) cannot be equal to a union of countably many closed subsets with empty interiors. Therefore, a Banach space cannot be the union of countably many closed subspaces, unless it is already equal to one of them; a Banach space with a countable Hamel basis is finite-dimensional.
Banach–Steinhaus Theorem. Let X be a Banach space and Y be a normed vector space. Suppose that F is a collection of continuous linear operators from X to Y. The uniform boundedness principle states that if for all x in X we have
, then
The Banach–Steinhaus theorem is not limited to Banach spaces. It can be extended for example to the case where X is a Fréchet space, provided the conclusion is modified as follows: under the same hypothesis, there exists a neighborhood U of 0 in X such that all T in F are uniformly bounded on U,
The Open Mapping Theorem. Let X and Y be Banach spaces and T : X → Y be a continuous linear operator. Then T is surjective if and only if T is an open map.
Corollary. Every one-to-one bounded linear operator from a Banach space onto a Banach space is an isomorphism.
The First Isomorphism Theorem for Banach spaces. Suppose that X and Y are Banach spaces and that T ∈ B(X, Y). Suppose further that the range of T is closed in Y. Then X / Ker(T) is isomorphic to T(X).
This result is a direct consequence of the preceding Banach isomorphism theorem and of the canonical factorization of bounded linear maps.
Corollary. If a Banach space X is the internal direct sum of closed subspaces M1, ..., Mn, then X is isomorphic to M1 ⊕ ... ⊕ Mn.
This is another consequence of Banach's isomorphism theorem, applied to the continuous bijection from M1 ⊕ ... ⊕ Mn onto X sending (m1, ... , mn) to the sum m1 + ... + mn.
The Closed Graph Theorem. Let T : X → Y be a linear mapping between Banach spaces. The graph of T is closed in X × Y if and only if T is continuous.
Reflexivity[edit]
For every normed space X, there is a natural map F : X → X ′′ (the dual of the dual = bidual) defined by
- F(x)(f) = f(x) for all x in X and f in X ′.
Because F(x) is a continuous linear functional on X ′, it is an element of X ′′. The map F : x → F(x) is thus a map X → X ′′. As a consequence of the Hahn–Banach theorem, this map is injective and isometric. If F is also surjective, then the normed space X is called reflexive. Since the dual of a normed space is complete, every reflexive normed space is a Banach space.
Theorem. If X is a reflexive Banach space, every closed subspace of X and every quotient space of X are reflexive.
This is a consequence of the Hahn–Banach theorem. Further, by the open mapping theorem, if there is a bounded linear operator from the Banach space X onto the Banach space Y, then Y is reflexive.
Theorem. If X is a Banach space, then X is reflexive if and only if X ′ is reflexive.
Corollary. Let X be a reflexive Banach space. Then X is separable if and only if X ′ is separable.
Indeed, if the dual Y ′ of a Banach space Y is separable, then Y is separable. If X is reflexive and separable, then the dual of X ′ is separable, so X ′ is separable.
Theorem. Suppose that X1, ..., Xn are normed spaces and that X = X1 ⊕ ... ⊕ Xn. Then X is reflexive if and only if each Xj is reflexive.
Hilbert spaces are reflexive. The Lp spaces are reflexive when 1 < p < ∞. More generally, uniformly convex spaces are reflexive, by the Milman–Pettis theorem. The spaces c0, ℓ1, L1([0, 1]), C([0, 1]) are not reflexive. In these examples of non-reflexive spaces X, the bidual X ′′ is "much larger" than X. Namely, under the natural isometric embedding of X into X ′′ given by the Hahn–Banach theorem, the quotient X ′′ / X is infinite dimensional, and even nonseparable. However, Robert C. James has constructed an example[25] of a non-reflexive space, usually called "the James space" and denoted by J,[26] such that the quotient J ′′ / J is one dimensional. Furthermore, this space J is isometrically isomorphic to its bidual.
Theorem. A Banach space X is reflexive if and only if its unit ball is compact in the weak topology.
When X is reflexive, it follows that all closed and bounded convex subsets of X are weakly compact. In a Hilbert space H, the weak compactness of the unit ball is very often used in the following way: every bounded sequence in H has weakly convergent subsequences.
Weak compactness of the unit ball provides a tool for finding solutions in reflexive spaces to certain optimization problems. For example, every convex continuous function on the unit ball B of a reflexive space attains its minimum at some point in B.
As a special case of the preceding result, when X is a reflexive space over R, every continuous linear functional f in X ′ attains its maximum ǁf ǁ on the unit ball of X. The following theorem of Robert C. James provides a converse statement.
James' Theorem. For a Banach space the following two properties are equivalent:
- X is reflexive.
- for all f in X ′ there exists x in X with ǁxǁ ≤ 1, so that f (x) = ǁf ǁ.
The theorem can be extended to give a characterization of weakly compact convex sets. On every non-reflexive Banach space X, there exist continuous linear functionals that are not norm-attaining. However, the Bishop–Phelps theorem[27] states that norm-attaining functionals are norm dense in the dual X ′ of X.
Schauder bases[edit]
A Schauder basis in a Banach space X is a sequence {en }n ≥ 0 of vectors in X with the property that for every vector x in X, there exist uniquely defined scalars {xn }n ≥ 0 depending on x, such that
It follows from the Banach–Steinhaus theorem that the linear mappings {Pn} are uniformly bounded by some constant C. Let {e*n} denote the coordinate functionals which assign to every x in X the coordinate xn of x in the above expansion. They are called biorthogonal functionals. When the basis vectors have norm 1, the coordinate functionals e*n have norm ≤ 2C in the dual of X.
Most classical spaces have explicit bases. The Haar system {hn} is a basis for Lp([0, 1]), 1 ≤ p < ∞. The trigonometric system is a basis in Lp(T) when 1 < p < ∞. The Schauder system is a basis in the space C([0, 1]).[28] The question of whether the disk algebra A(D) has a basis[29] remained open for more than forty years, until Bočkarev showed in 1974 that A(D) admits a basis constructed from the Franklin system.[30]
Since every vector x in a Banach space X with a basis is the limit of Pn(x), with Pn of finite rank and uniformly bounded, the space X satisfies the bounded approximation property. The first example[31] by Enflo of a space failing the approximation property was at the same time the first example of a Banach space without Schauder basis.
Robert C. James characterized reflexivity in Banach spaces with basis: the space X with a Schauder basis is reflexive if and only if the basis is both shrinking and boundedly complete.[32] In this case, the biorthogonal functionals form a basis of the dual of X.
Tensor product[edit]
Let X and Y be two K-vector spaces. The tensor product X ⊗ Y of X and Y is a K-vector space Z with a bilinear mapping T : X × Y → Z which has the following universal property: If T1 : X × Y → Z1 is any bilinear mapping into a K-vector space Z1, then there exists a unique linear mapping f : Z → Z1 such that T1 = f o T.
The image under T of a couple (x, y) in X × Y is denoted by x ⊗ y, and called a simple tensor. Every element z in X ⊗ Y is a finite sum of such simple tensors.
There are various norms that can be placed on the tensor product of the underlying vector spaces, amongst others the projective cross norm and injective cross norm introduced by A. Grothendieck in 1955.[33]
In general, the tensor product of complete spaces is not complete again. When working with Banach spaces, it is customary to call projective tensor product[34] of two Banach spaces X and Y the completion
of the algebraic tensor product X ⊗ Y equipped with the projective tensor norm, and similarly for the injective tensor product[35]
. Grothendieck proved in particular that[36]
where K is a compact Hausdorff space, C(K, Y) the Banach space of continuous functions from K to Y and L1([0, 1], Y) the space of Bochner-measurable and integrable functions from [0, 1] to Y, and where the isomorphisms are isometric. The two isomorphisms above are the respective extensions of the map sending the tensor f ⊗ y to the vector-valued function s ∈ K → f(s)y ∈ Y.
Tensor products and the approximation property[edit]
Let X be a Banach space. The tensor product
is identified isometrically with the closure in B(X) of the set of finite rank operators. When X has the approximation property, this closure coincides with the space of compact operators on X.
For every Banach space Y, there is a natural norm 1 linear map
obtained by extending the identity map of the algebraic tensor product. Grothendieck related the approximation problem to the question of whether this map is one-to-one when Y is the dual of X. Precisely, for every Banach space X, the map
is one-to-one if and only if X has the approximation property.[37]
Grothendieck conjectured that
and
must be different whenever X and Y are infinite dimensional Banach spaces. This was disproved by Gilles Pisier in 1983.[38] Pisier constructed an infinite dimensional Banach space X such that
and
are equal. Furthermore, just as Enflo's example, this space X is a "hand-made" space that fails to have the approximation property. On the other hand, Szankowski proved that the classical space B(ℓ2) does not have the approximation property.[39]
Characterizations of Hilbert space among Banach spaces[edit]
A necessary and sufficient condition for the norm of a Banach space X to be associated to an inner product is the parallelogram identity:
for all x and y in X. It follows, for example, that the Lebesgue space Lp([0, 1]) is a Hilbert space only when p = 2. If this identity is satisfied, the associated inner product is given by the polarization identity. In the case of real scalars, this gives:
For complex scalars, defining the inner product so as to be C-linear in x, antilinear in y, the polarization identity gives:
To see that the parallelogram law is sufficient, one observes in the real case that 〈x, y〉 is symmetric, and in the complex case, that it satisfies the Hermitian symmetry property and 〈i x, y〉 = i〈x, y〉. The parallelogram law implies that 〈x, y〉 is additive in x. It follows that it is linear over the rationals, thus linear by continuity.
Several characterizations of spaces isomorphic (rather than isometric) to Hilbert spaces are available. The parallelogram law can be extended to more than two vectors, and weakened by the introduction of a two-sided inequality with a constant c ≥ 1 : Kwapień proved that if
for every integer n and all families of vectors {xk } 1 ≤ k ≤ n in the Banach space X, then X is isomorphic to a Hilbert space.[40] Here, Ave denotes the average over the 2n possible choices of signs ± 1. In the same article, Kwapień proved that the validity of a Banach-valued Parseval's theorem for the Fourier transform characterizes Banach spaces isomorphic to Hilbert spaces.
Lindenstrauss and Tzafriri proved that a Banach space in which every closed linear subspace is complemented (that is, is the range of a bounded linear projection) is isomorphic to a Hilbert space.[41] The proof rests upon Dvoretzky's theorem about Euclidean sections of high dimensional centrally symmetric convex bodies. In other words, Dvoretzky's theorem states that for every integer n, any finite dimensional normed space, with dimension sufficiently large compared to n, contains subspaces nearly isometric to the n-dimensional Euclidean space.
The next result gives the solution of the so-called homogeneous space problem. An infinite dimensional Banach space X is said to be homogeneous if it is isomorphic to all its infinite dimensional closed subspaces. A Banach space isomorphic to ℓ2 is homogeneous, and Banach asked for the converse.[42]
Theorem.[43] A Banach space isomorphic to all its infinite dimensional closed subspaces is isomorphic to a separable Hilbert space.
An infinite dimensional Banach space is hereditarily indecomposable when no subspace of it can be isomorphic to the direct sum of two infinite dimensional Banach spaces. The Gowers dichotomy theorem[43] asserts that every infinite dimensional Banach space X contains, either a subspace Y with unconditional basis, or a hereditarily indecomposable subspace Z, and in particular, Z is not isomorphic to its closed hyperplanes.[44] If X is homogeneous, it must therefore have an unconditional basis. It follows then from the partial solution obtained by Komorowski and Tomczak–Jaegermann, for spaces with an unconditional basis,[45] that X is isomorphic to ℓ2.
Examples[edit]
Here K denotes the field of real numbers or complex numbers, I is a closed and bounded interval [a, b] and p, q are real numbers with 1 < p, q < ∞ so that
The symbol Σ denotes a σ-algebra of sets, and Ξ denotes just an algebra of sets (for spaces only requiring finite additivity, such as the ba space). The symbol μ denotes a positive measure: that is, a real-valued positive set function defined on a σ-algebra which is countably additive.
| Classical Banach spaces | |||||
| Dual space | Reflexive | weakly complete | Norm | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kn | Kn | Yes | Yes | ![]() |
|
| ℓnp | ℓnq | Yes | Yes | ![]() |
|
| ℓn∞ | ℓn1 | Yes | Yes | ![]() |
|
| ℓp | ℓq | Yes | Yes | ![]() |
|
| ℓ1 | ℓ∞ | No | Yes | ![]() |
|
| ℓ∞ | ba | No | No | ![]() |
|
| c | ℓ1 | No | No | ![]() |
|
| c0 | ℓ1 | No | No | ![]() |
Isomorphic but not isometric to c. |
| bv | ℓ1 + K | No | Yes | ![]() |
|
| bv0 | ℓ1 | No | Yes | ![]() |
|
| bs | ba | No | No | ![]() |
Isometrically isomorphic to ℓ∞. |
| cs | ℓ1 | No | No | ![]() |
Isometrically isomorphic to c. |
| B(X, Ξ) | ba(Ξ) | No | No | ![]() |
|
| C(X) | rca(X) | No | No | ![]() |
X is a compact Hausdorff space. |
| ba(Ξ) | ? | No | Yes | ![]() |
is the variation of μ |
| ca(Σ) | ? | No | Yes | ![]() |
A closed subspace of ba(Σ). |
| rca(Σ) | ? | No | Yes | ![]() |
A closed subspace of ca(Σ). |
| Lp(μ) | Lq(μ) | Yes | Yes | ![]() |
|
| BV(I) | ? | No | Yes | ![]() |
Vf(I) is the total variation of f |
| NBV(I) | ? | No | Yes | ![]() |
NBV(I) consists of BV(I) functions such that ![]() |
| AC(I) | K + L∞(I) | No | Yes | ![]() |
Isomorphic to the Sobolev space W1,1(I). |
| Cn[a,b] | rca([a,b]) | No | No | ![]() |
Isomorphic to Rn ⊕ C([a,b]), essentially by Taylor's theorem. |
Derivatives[edit]
Several concepts of a derivative may be defined on a Banach space. See the articles on the Fréchet derivative and the Gâteaux derivative for details. The Fréchet derivative allows for an extension of the concept of a directional derivative to Banach spaces. The Gâteaux derivative allows for an extension of a directional derivative to locally convex topological vector spaces. Fréchet differentiability is a stronger condition than Gâteaux differentiability. The quasi-derivative is another generalization of directional derivative that implies a stronger condition than Gâteaux differentiability, but a weaker condition than Fréchet differentiability.
Further results[edit]
Theorem. If there are Banach spaces which are invariant under the action of an integrable group representation and give their atomic decompositions with respect to coherent states, then the atoms arise from a single element under the group action.[46]
Theorem. If X is a separable infinite dimensional Banach space then its isomorphism class has infinite diameter with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance.[47]
Theorem. If X is a separable Banach space such that for some K < ∞ every isomorph of X is K-elastic the X is finite dimensional.[47]
Theorem. Every n-homogeneous continuous polynomial on a Banach space E which is weakly continuous on the unit ball of E is weakly uniformly continuous on the unit ball of E.[48]
Theorem. If X is a strictly convex Banach space with the Radon-Nikodym property, then the quasihyperbolic geodesics in X are unique.[49]
Generalizations[edit]
Several important spaces in functional analysis, for instance the space of all infinitely often differentiable functions R → R, or the space of all distributions on R, are complete but are not normed vector spaces and hence not Banach spaces. In Fréchet spaces one still has a complete metric, while LF-spaces are complete uniform vector spaces arising as limits of Fréchet spaces.
See also[edit]
Notes[edit]
- ^ Bourbaki 1987, V.86
- ^ see Theorem 1.3.9, p. 20 in Megginson (1998).
- ^ see Corollary 1.4.18, p. 32 in Megginson (1998).
- ^ see Banach (1932), p. 182.
- ^ a b see pp. 17–19 in Carothers (2005).
- ^ see Banach (1932), pp. 11-12.
- ^ see Banach (1932), Th. 9 p. 185.
- ^ see Theorem 6.1, p. 55 in Carothers (2005)
- ^ Several books about functional analysis use the notation X* for the continuous dual, for example Carothers (2005), Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977), Megginson (1998), Ryan (2002), Wojtaszczyk (1991).
- ^ Theorem 1.9.6, p. 75 in Megginson (1998)
- ^ see also Theorem 2.2.26, p. 179 in Megginson (1998)
- ^ see p. 19 in Carothers (2005).
- ^ Theorems 1.10.16, 1.10.17 pp.94–95 in Megginson (1998)
- ^ Theorem 1.12.11, p. 112 in Megginson (1998)
- ^ Theorem 2.5.16, p. 216 in Megginson (1998).
- ^ see II.A.8, p. 29 in Wojtaszczyk (1991)
- ^ see Theorem 2.6.23, p. 231 in Megginson (1998).
- ^ see N. Bourbaki, (2004), "Integration I", Springer Verlag, ISBN 3-540-41129-1.
- ^ a b Eilenberg, Samuel (Jan 22, 1942). "Banach Space Methods in Topology". Annals of Mathematics 43 (3): 568.
- ^ see also Banach (1932), p. 170 for metrizable K and L.
- ^ see D. Amir, "On isomorphisms of continuous function spaces". Israel J. Math. 3 (1965), 205–210.
- ^ M. Cambern, "A generalized Banach-Stone theorem". Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 396–400, and "On isomorphisms with small bound". Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), 1062–1066.
- ^ H. B. Cohen, "A bound-two isomorphism between C(X) Banach spaces". Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 50 (1975), 215–217.
- ^ see for example W. Arveson, (1976), "An Invitation to C*-Algebra", Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-90176-0.
- ^ R. C. James (1951). "A non-reflexive Banach space isometric with its second conjugate space". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 37: 174–177.
- ^ see Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977), p. 25.
- ^ see E. Bishop and R. Phelps, "A proof that every Banach space is subreflexive". Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1961), 97–98.
- ^ see Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977) p. 3.
- ^ the question appears p. 238, §3 in Banach's book, Banach (1932).
- ^ see S. V. Bočkarev, "Existence of a basis in the space of functions analytic in the disc, and some properties of Franklin's system". (Russian) Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 95(137) (1974), 3–18, 159.
- ^ see P. Enflo, "A counterexample to the approximation property in Banach spaces". Acta Math. 130, 309–317(1973).
- ^ see R.C. James, "Bases and reflexivity of Banach spaces". Ann. of Math. (2) 52, (1950). 518–527. See also Lindenstrauss & Tzafriri (1977) p. 9.
- ^ see A. Grothendieck, "Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucléaires". Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1955 (1955), no. 16, 140 pp., and A. Grothendieck, "Résumé de la théorie métrique des produits tensoriels topologiques". Bol. Soc. Mat. São Paulo 8 1953 1–79.
- ^ see chap. 2, p. 15 in Ryan (2002).
- ^ see chap. 3, p. 45 in Ryan (2002).
- ^ see Example. 2.19, p. 29, and pp. 49–50 in Ryan (2002).
- ^ see Proposition 4.6, p. 74 in Ryan (2002).
- ^ see Pisier, Gilles (1983), "Counterexamples to a conjecture of Grothendieck", Acta Math. 151:181–208.
- ^ see Szankowski, Andrzej (1981), "B(H) does not have the approximation property", Acta Math. 147: 89–108. Ryan claims that this result is due to Per Enflo, p. 74 in Ryan (2002).
- ^ see Kwapień, S. (1970), "A linear topological characterization of inner-product spaces", Studia Math. 38:277–278.
- ^ see Lindenstrauss, J. and Tzafriri, L. (1971), "On the complemented subspaces problem", Israel J. Math. 9:263–269.
- ^ see p. 245 in Banach (1932). The homogeneity property is called "propriété (15)" there. Banach writes: "on ne connaît aucun exemple d'espace à une infinité de dimensions qui, sans être isomorphe avec (L2), possède la propriété (15)".
- ^ a b Gowers, W. T. (1996), "A new dichotomy for Banach spaces", Geom. Funct. Anal. 6:1083–1093.
- ^ see Gowers, W. T. (1994), "A solution to Banach's hyperplane problem", Bull. London Math. Soc. 26:523–530.
- ^ see Komorowski, Ryszard A. and Tomczak–Jaegermann, Nicole (1995), "Banach spaces without local unconditional structure", Israel J. Math. 89:205–226 and also (1998), "Erratum to: Banach spaces without local unconditional structure", Israel J. Math. 105:85–92.
- ^ Hans G. Feichtinger, K.H Gröchenig (October 1989). "Banach spaces related to integrable group representations and their atomic decompositions, I". Journal of Functional Analysis 86 (2): 307–340.
- ^ a b W. B. Johnson and E. Odell (Jul 2005). "The diameter of the isomorphism class of a Banach space". Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 162 (1): 423–437.
- ^ Aron, R.M (Jan 15, 1983). "Weakly continuous mappings on Banach spaces". Journal of Functional Analysis 52 (2): 189–204.
- ^ Rasila, Antti (Jan 5, 2013). "On Quasihyperbolic Geodesics in Banach Spaces". ArXiv.org.
References[edit]
- Banach, Stefan (1932), Théorie des opérations linéaires, Monografie Matematyczne 1, Warszawa: Subwencji Funduszu Kultury Narodowej, Zbl 0005.20901.
- Beauzamy, Bernard (1985 [1982]), Introduction to Banach Spaces and their Geometry (Second revised ed.), North-Holland.
- Bourbaki, Nicolas (1987), Topological vector spaces, Elements of mathematics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-13627-9.
- Carothers, Neal L. (2005), A short course on Banach space theory, London Mathematical Society Student Texts 64, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xii+184, ISBN 0-521-84283-2.
- Dunford, Nelson; Schwartz, Jacob T. with the assistance of W. G. Bade and R. G. Bartle (1958), Linear Operators. I. General Theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics 7, New York: Interscience Publishers, Inc., MR 0117523
- Lindenstrauss, Joram; Tzafriri, Lior (1977), Classical Banach Spaces I, Sequence Spaces, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 92, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-08072-4.
- Megginson, Robert E. (1998), An introduction to Banach space theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 183, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. xx+596, ISBN 0-387-98431-3.
- Ryan, Raymond A. (2002), Introduction to Tensor Products of Banach Spaces, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, London: Springer-Verlag, pp. xiv+225, ISBN 1-85233-437-1.
- Wojtaszczyk, Przemysław (1991), Banach spaces for analysts, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 25, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xiv+382, ISBN 0-521-35618-0.
- Deitmar, A: Funktionalanalysis Skript WS2011/12 < http://www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/~deitmar/LEHRE/frueher/2011-12/FA/FA.pdf>
External links[edit]
- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001), "Banach space", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
- Weisstein, Eric W., "Banach Space", MathWorld.
.











, then 


![\begin{align}
C(K) \widehat{\otimes}_\varepsilon Y &\simeq C(K, Y), \\
L^1([0, 1]) \widehat{\otimes}_\pi Y &\simeq L^1([0, 1], Y),
\end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/5/b/75bedc69580fa2e83c188dd649b9a207.png)



















is 



![\|f\| = \sum_{i=0}^n \sup\nolimits_{x\in [a,b]} \left |f^{(i)}(x) \right |](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/6/4/7642b9debcec5c2a60ad0c20a86d7a48.png)