Jump to content

Neilson v A-G

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs) at 19:13, 25 April 2022 (add {{Use dmy dates}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Neilson v A-G
CourtCourt of Appeal of New Zealand
Full case name Neilson v A-G
Decided3 May 2001 Richardson P, Gault, Thomas, Keith, McGrath JJ
Citation[2001] 3 NZLR 433
Court membership
Judges sittingRichardson P, Gault J, Thomas J, Keith J, McGrath J
Keywords
negligence

Neilson v A-G [2001] 3 NZLR 433 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding suing under the Bill of Rights Act for unlawful arrest.[1]

Background

After Neilson was dismissed from his job as a private investigator, he subsequently won a personal grievance in the Employment Court against his former employer.

Part of the employers unsuccessful defence was that Neilson had pocketed some fees from one of their clients.

Eight days after losing in the Employment Court, the employer lodged a complaint with the police regarding the misappropriated money.

The police, without doing a proper investigation, and despite evidence that would suggest that no crime had occurred, a police office arrested Neilson without first obtaining an arrest warrant.

Later, Neilson was discharged without conviction, and sued the police for wrongful arrest, and was awarded $10,000 in damages.

The police appealed.

Held

The court ruled that the arrest was still illegal, but did reduce the damages award to $5,000.

References

  1. ^ McLay, Geoff (2003). Butterworths Student Companion Torts (4th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71686-X.