Jump to content

openEHR

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 13:15, 22 June 2022 (Add: s2cid, page. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 850/1992). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

openEHR is an open standard specification in health informatics that describes the management and storage, retrieval and exchange of health data in electronic health records (EHRs). In openEHR, all health data for a person is stored in a "one lifetime", vendor-independent, person-centred EHR. The openEHR specifications include an EHR Extract specification[1] but are otherwise not primarily concerned with the exchange of data between EHR-systems as this is the focus of other standards such as EN 13606 and HL7.

The openEHR specifications are maintained by the openEHR Foundation, a not for profit foundation supporting the open research, development, and implementation of openEHR EHRs. The specifications are based on a combination of 15 years of European and Australian research and development into EHRs and new paradigms, including what has become known as the archetype methodology[2][3] for specification of content.

The openEHR specifications[4] include information and service models for the EHR, demographics, clinical workflow and archetypes. They are designed to be the basis of a medico-legally sound, distributed, versioned EHR infrastructure.

Architecture

Block diagram of openEHR specification components.

The architecture of the openEHR specifications as a whole consists of the following key elements:

  • information models (aka 'Reference Model');
  • the archetype formalism;
  • the portable archetype query language;
  • service models / APIs.

The use of the first two enable the development of 'archetypes' and 'templates', which are formal models of clinical and related content, and constitute a layer of de facto standards of their own, far more numerous than the base specifications on which they are built. The query language enables queries to be built based on the archetypes, rather than physical database schemata, thus decoupling queries from physical persistence details. The service models define access to key back-end services, including the EHR Service and Demographics Service, while a growing set of lightweight REST-based APIs based on archetype paths are used for application access.

The openEHR Architecture Overview provides a summary of the architecture and the detailed specifications.[5]

Reference model

A central part of the openEHR specifications is the set of information models, known in openEHR as 'reference models'.[6] The models constitute the base information models for openEHR systems, and define the invariant semantics of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), EHR Extract, and Demographics model, as well as supporting data types, data structures, identifiers and useful design patterns.

Some of the key classes in the EHR component are the ENTRY classes, whose subtypes include OBSERVATION, EVALUATION, INSTRUCTION, ACTION and ADMIN_ENTRY, as well as the Instruction State Machine, a state machine defining a standard model of the lifecycle of interventions, including medication orders, surgery and other therapies.

Archetypes and multi-level modelling

A key innovation in the openEHR framework is to leave all specification of clinical information out of the information model (also known as "reference model") and instead to provide a powerful means of expressing definitions of the content clinicians and patients need to record that can be directly consumed at runtime by systems built on the Reference Model. This is justified by the need to deal scalably with the generic problem in health of a very large, growing, and ever-changing set of information types.[7]

The semantic framework of openEHR

Clinical content is specified in terms of two types of artefact which exist outside the information model. The first, known as "archetypes" provides a place to formally define re-usable data point and data group definitions, i.e. content items that will be re-used in numerous contexts. Typical examples include "systemic arterial blood pressure measurement" and "serum sodium". Many such data points occur in logical groups, e.g. the group of data items to document an allergic reaction, or the analytes in a liver function test result. Some archetypes contain numerous data points, e.g. 50, although a more common number is 10-20. A collection of archetypes can be understood as a "library" of re-usable domain content definitions, with each archetype functioning as a "governance unit", whose contents are co-designed, reviewed and published.

The second kind of artefact is known in openEHR as a "template", and is used to logically represent a use case-specific data-set, such as the data items making up a patient discharge summary, or a radiology report.[8] A template is constructed by referencing relevant items from a number of archetypes. A template might only require one or two data points or groups from each archetype. In terms of the technical representation, openEHR templates cannot violate the semantics of the archetypes from which they are constructed. Templates are almost always developed for local use by software developers and clinical analysts. Templates are typically defined for GUI screen forms, message definitions and document definitions, and as such, correspond to "operational" content definitions.

The justification for the two layers of models over and above the information model is that if data set definitions consist of pre-defined data points from a library of such definitions, then all recorded data (i.e. instances of templates) will ultimately just be instances of the standard content definitions. This provides a basis for standardised querying to work. Without the archetype "library" level, every data set (i.e. chunk of operational content) is uniquely defined and a standard approach to querying is difficult.

Accordingly, openEHR defines a method of querying based on archetypes, known as AQL (Archetype Querying Language).[9]

Notably, openEHR has been used to model shared care plan. The archetypes have been designed to accommodate the concepts of the shared care plan.[10]

While individual health records may be vastly different in content, the core information in openEHR data instances always complies to archetypes. The way this works is by creating archetypes which express clinical information in a way that is highly reusable, even universal in some cases.[11]

Archetype formalism

openEHR archetypes are expressed in "Archetype Definition Language", an openEHR public specification. Two versions are available: ADL 1.4,[12] and ADL 2,[13] a new release with better support for specialisation, redefinition and annotations, among other improvements.[14] The 1.4 release of ADL and its "object model" counterpart Archetype Object Model (AOM) are the basis for the CEN and ISO "Archetype Definition Language" standard (ISO standard 13606-2).[15]

Templates have historically been developed in a simple, de facto industry-developed XML format, known as ".oet", after the file extension.[16] ADL 2 defines a way to express templates seamlessly with archetypes, using extensions of the ADL language.[17]

Quality assurance of archetypes

Various principles for developing archetypes have been identified.[18] For example, a set of openEHR archetypes needs to be quality managed to conform to a number of axioms such as being mutually exclusive. The archetypes can be managed independently from software implementations and infrastructure, in the hands of clinician groups to ensure they meet the real needs on the ground. Archetypes are designed to allow the specification of clinical knowledge to evolve and develop over time. Challenges in implementation of information designs expressed in openEHR centre on the extent to which actual system constraints are in harmony with the information design.[citation needed]

In the field of Electronic health records there are a number of existing information models with overlaps in their scope which are difficult to manage, such as between HL7 V3 and SNOMED CT. The openEHR approach faces harmonisation challenges unless used in isolation.[19]

International collaboration

Following the openEHR approach, the use of shared and governed archetypes globally would ensure openEHR health data could be consistently manipulated and viewed, regardless of the technical, organisational and cultural context. This approach also means the actual data models used by any EHR are flexible, given that new archetypes may be defined to meet future needs of clinical record keeping. Recently, work in Australia has demonstrated how archetypes and templates may be used to facilitate the use of legacy health record and message data in an openEHR health record system, and output standardised messages and CDA documents.

The prospect of gaining agreement on design and on forms of governance at the international level remains speculative, with influences ranging from the diverse medico-legal environments to cultural variations, to technical variations such as the extent to which a reference clinical terminology is to be integral.

The openEHR framework is consistent with the Electronic Health Record Communication Standard (ISO 13606), and the Archetype Object Model 2 (AOM2) has been officially accepted by ISO TC 215 as the draft specification for the 2017 revision of ISO 13606:2.

International adoption

openEHR archetypes are being used by the National e-Health Transition Authority of Australia, the UK NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC), the Norwegian Nasjonal IKT organisation, and the Slovenian Ministry of Health.

openEHR has been selected as the basis for the standardised EHR in Brazil.[20]

It is beginning to be utilised in commercial solutions throughout the world, including those produced by the openEHR Industry Partners.

Clinical Knowledge Manager (CKM)

One of the outcomes of openEHR modelling approach is the open development of archetypes, templates and terminology subsets to represent health data. Due to the open nature of openEHR, these structures are publicly available to be used and implemented in health information systems. Community users are able to share, discuss and approve these structures in a collaborative repository known as the Clinical Knowledge Manager (CKM). Some currently used openEHR CKMs:

  • openEHR Clinical Knowledge Manager
  • NEHTA Clinical Knowledge Manager
  • UK Clinical Knowledge Manager
  • Norwegian National ICT Clinical Knowledge Manager
  • Slovenian MoH Clinical Knowledge Manager

See also

References

  1. ^ Specifications Editorial Committee. "openEHR EHR Extract IM". openEHR Foundation. openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  2. ^ Beale T (2002). "Archetypes: Constraint-based Domain Models for Future-proof Information Systems" (PDF). Proceedings of the 11th OOPSLA Workshop on Behavioural Semantics. (PDF)
  3. ^ Heard, S.; Beale, T., eds. (2007). "openEHR Architecture Overview" (PDF). openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 9 April 2013. (PDF)
  4. ^ openEHR Specification Program. "openEHR Specifications". openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  5. ^ openEHR Specification Program. "openEHR Architecture Overview". openEHR Foundation. openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  6. ^ openEHR Specification Program. "openEHR Reference Model". openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  7. ^ openEHR Specification Program. "Archetype Technology Overview". openEHR Foundation. openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  8. ^ "What is openEHR". openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
  9. ^ "Archetype Query Language (AQL)". openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
  10. ^ Hägglund M, Chen R, Koch S (2011). "Modeling shared care plans using CONTsys and openEHR to support shared homecare of the elderly". Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 18 (1): 66–9. doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.000216. PMC 3005865. PMID 21106993.
  11. ^ "Clinical Standardisation". openEHR Foundation. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
  12. ^ Beale, T; Heard, S, eds. (12 Dec 2008), Archetype Definition Language 1.4, openEHR Foundation.
  13. ^ openEHR Specification Program (3 Nov 2015), Archetype Definition Language 2, openEHR Foundation
  14. ^ "ADL/AOM 2 specifications". openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 3 Nov 2015.
  15. ^ Kryszyn J, Cywoniuk K, Smolik WT, Wanta D, Wróblewski P, Midura M (2022). "Performance of an openEHR based hospital information system". International Journal of Medical Informatics. 162: 104757. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104757. PMID 35395475. S2CID 247899113.
  16. ^ "Template ".oet" XSD". openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
  17. ^ openEHR Specification Program. "Archetype Definition Language (ADL2) specification". openEHR Foundation. openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  18. ^ Heard, S.; Beale, T., eds. (2005). "Archetype definitions and principles" (PDF). openEHR Foundation. Retrieved 9 April 2013. (PDF)
  19. ^ Min L, Tian Q, Lu X, Duan H (August 2018). "Modeling EHR with the openEHR approach: an exploratory study in China". BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 18 (1): 75. doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0650-6. PMC 6116359. PMID 30157838.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  20. ^ "Ministério da Saúde". bvsms.saude.gov.br. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OpenEHR&oldid=1094410458"