Stem cell niche
Stem cell niche refers to a microenvironment where stem cells are found, which interacts with stem cells to regulate cell fate. The word 'niche' can be in reference to the in vivo or in vitro stem cell microenvironment. During embryonic development, various niche factors act on embryonic stem cells to alter gene expression, and induce their proliferation or differentiation for the development of the fetus. Within the human body, stem cell niches maintain adult stem cells in a quiescent state, but after tissue injury, the surrounding micro-environment actively signals to stem cells to promote either self renewal or differentiation to form new tissues. Several factors are important to regulate stem cell characteristics within the niche: cell-cell interactions between stem cells, as well as interactions between stem cells and neighbouring differentiated cells, interactions between stem cells and adhesion molecules, extracellular matrix components, the oxygen tension, growth factors, cytokines, and the physicochemical nature of the environment including the pH, ionic strength (e.g. Ca2+ concentration) and metabolites, like ATP, are also important. The stem cells and niche may induce each other during development and reciprocally signal to maintain each other during adulthood.
Scientists are studying the various components of the niche and trying to replicate the in vivo niche conditions in vitro. This is because for regenerative therapies, cell proliferation and differentiation must be controlled in flasks or plates, so that sufficient quantity of the proper cell type are produced prior to being introduced back into the patient for therapy.
Human embryonic stem cells are often grown in fibroblastic growth factor-2 containing, fetal bovine serum supplemented media. They are grown on a feeder layer of cells, which is believed to be supportive in maintaining the pluripotent characteristics of embryonic stem cells. However, even these conditions may not truly mimic in vivo niche conditions.
Adult stem cells remain in an undifferentiated state throughout adult life. However, when they are cultured in vitro, they often undergo an 'aging' process in which their morphology is changed and their proliferative capacity is decreased. It is believed that correct culturing conditions of adult stem cells needs to be improved so that adult stem cells can maintain their stemness over time.
A Nature Insight review defines niche as follows:
"Stem-cell populations are established in 'niches' — specific anatomic locations that regulate how they participate in tissue generation, maintenance and repair. The niche saves stem cells from depletion, while protecting the host from over-exuberant stem-cell proliferation. It constitutes a basic unit of tissue physiology, integrating signals that mediate the balanced response of stem cells to the needs of organisms. Yet the niche may also induce pathologies by imposing aberrant function on stem cells or other targets. The interplay between stem cells and their niche creates the dynamic system necessary for sustaining tissues, and for the ultimate design of stem-cell therapeutics...The simple location of stem cells is not sufficient to define a niche. The niche must have both anatomic and functional dimensions"—David T. Scadden, The stem-cell niche as an entity of action, Nature, 441 (7097), 1075-1079 (29 June 2006)
- 1 History
- 2 Examples of stem cell niches
- 2.1 The Germline Stem Cell niche
- 2.2 GSC Niche in Drosophila ovaries
- 2.3 GSC Niche in Drosophila testes
- 2.4 GSC Niche in Mouse Testes
- 2.5 Vertebrate Adult stem cell niches
- 2.6 Cancer Stem cell niche
- 2.7 Injury induced stem cell niches
- 3 References
Though the concept of stem cell niche was prevailing in vertebrates, the first characterization of stem cell niche in vivo was worked out in Drosophila germinal development.
Examples of stem cell niches
The Germline Stem Cell niche
Germline stem cells (GSCs) are found in organisms that continuously produce sperm and eggs until they are sterile. These specialized stem cells reside in the GSC niche, the initial site for gamete production, which is composed of the GSCs, somatic stem cells, and other somatic cells. In particular, the GSC niche is well studied in the genetic model organism Drosophila melanogaster and has provided an extensive understanding of the molecular basis of stem cell regulation.
GSC Niche in Drosophila ovaries
In Drosophila melanogaster, the GSC niche resides in the anterior-most region of each ovariole, known as the germarium. The GSC niche consists of necessary somatic cells-terminal filament cells, cap cells, escort cells, and other stem cells which function to maintain the GSCs. The GSC niche holds on average 2-3 GSCs, which are directly attached to somatic cap cells and Escort stem cells, which send maintenance signals directly to the GSCs. GSCs are easily identified through histological staining against vasa protein (to identify germ cells) and 1B1 protein (to outline cell structures and a germline specific fusome structure). Their physical attachment to the cap cells is necessary for their maintenance and activity. A GSC will divide asymmetrically to produce one daughter cystoblast, which then undergoes 4 rounds of incomplete mitosis as it progresses down the ovariole (through the process of oogenesis) eventually emerging as a mature egg chamber; the fusome found in the GSCs functions in cyst formation and may regulate asymmetrical cell divisions of the GSCs. Because of the abundant genetic tools available for use in Drosophila melanogaster and the ease of detecting GSCs through histological stainings, researchers have uncovered several molecular pathways controlling GSC maintenance and activity.
Molecular Mechanisms of GSC maintenance and activity
The Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) ligands Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Glass-bottom-boat (Gbb) ligand are directly signaled to the GSCs, and are essential for GSC maintenance and self-renewal. BMP signaling in the niche functions to directly repress expression of Bag-of-marbles(Bam) in GSCs, which is up-regulated in developing cystoblast cells. Loss of function of dpp in the niche results in de-repression of Bam in GSCs, resulting in rapid differentiation of the GSCs. Along with BMP signaling, cap cells also signal other molecules to GSCs: Yb and Piwi. Both of these molecules are required non-autonomously to the GSCs for proliferation-piwi is also required autonomously in the GSCs for proliferation. Interestingly, in the germarium, BMP signaling has a short-range effect, therefore the physical attachment of GSCs to cap cells is important for maintenance and activity.
Physical attachment of GSCs to cap cells
The GSCs are physically attached to the cap cells by Drosophila E-cadherin (DE-cadherin) adherens junctions and if this physical attachment is lost GSCs will differentiate and lose their identity as a stem cell. The gene encoding DE-cadherin, shotgun (shg), and a gene encoding Beta-catenin ortholog, armadillo, control this physical attachment. A GTPase molecule, rab11, is involved in cell trafficking of DE-cadherins. Knocking out rab11 in GSCs results in detachment of GSCs from the cap cells and premature differentiation of GSCs. Additionally, zero population growth (zpg), encoding a germline-specific gap junction is required for germ cell differentiation.
Systemic signals regulating GSCs
Both diet and insulin-like signaling directly control GSC proliferation in Drosophila melanogaster. Increasing levels of Drosophila insulin-like peptide (DILP) through diet results in increased GSC proliferation. Up-regulation of DILPs in aged GSCs and their niche results in increased maintenance and proliferation. It has also been shown that DILPs regulate cap cell quantities and regulate the physical attachment of GSCs to cap cells.
There are two possible mechanisms for stem cell renewal, symmetrical GSC division or de-differentiation of cystoblasts. Normally, GSCs will divide asymmetrically to produce one daughter cystoblast, but it has been proposed that symmetrical division could result in the two daughter cells remaining GSCs. If GSCs are ablated to create an empty niche and the cap cells are still present and sending maintenance signals, differentiated cystoblasts can be recruited to the niche and de-differentiate into functional GSCs.
Stem cell aging
As the Drosophila female ages, the stem cell niche undergoes age-dependent loss of GSC presence and activity. These losses are thought to be caused in part by degradation of the important signaling factors from the niche that maintains GSCs and their activity. Progressive decline in GSC activity contributes to the observed reduction in fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster at old age; this decline in GSC activity can be partially attributed to a reduction of signaling pathway activity in the GSC niche. It has been found that there is a reduction in Dpp and Gbb signaling through aging. In addition to a reduction in niche signaling pathway activity, GSCs age cell-autonomously. In addition to studying the decline of signals coming from the niche, GSCs age intrinsically; there is age-dependent reduction of adhesion of GSCs to the cap cells and there is accumulation of Reactive Oxygen species (ROS) resulting in cellular damage which contributes to GSC aging. There is an observed reduction in the number of cap cells and the physical attachment of GSCs to cap cells through aging. Shg is expressed at significantly lower levels in an old GSC niche in comparison to a young one.
GSC Niche in Drosophila testes
In the Drosophila testis the niche consists of the hub cells which support two adjacent stem cell populations: the germline stem cells and the somatic cyst progenitor cells.
GSC Niche in Mouse Testes
The murine GSC niche in males, also called spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) niche, is located in the basal region of seminiferous tubules in the testes. The seminiferous epithelium is composed of sertoli cells that are in contact with the basement membrane of the tubules, which separates the sertoli cells from the interstitial tissue below. This interstitial tissue comprises of Leydig cells, macrophages, mesenchymal cells , capillary networks, and nerves.
During development, primordial germ cells migrate into the seminiferous tubules and downward towards the basement membrane whilst remaining attached to the sertoli cells where they will subsequently differentiate into SSCs, also referred to as Asingle spermatogonia. These SSCs can either self-renew or commit to differentiating into spermatozoa upon the proliferation of Asingle into Apaired spermatogonia. The 2 cells of Apaired spermatogonia remain attached by intercellular bridges and subsequently divide into Aaligned spermatogonia, which is made up of 4-16 connected cells. Aaligned spermatogonia then undergo meiosis I to form spermatocytes and meiosis II to form spermatids which will mature into spermatozoa. This differentiation occurs along the longitudinal axis of sertoli cells, from the basement membrane to the apical lumen of the seminiferous tubules. However, sertoli cells form tight junctions that separate SSCs and spermatogonia in contact with the basement membrane from the spermatocytes and spermatids to create a basal and an adluminal compartment, whereby differentiating spermatocytes must traverse the tight junctions. These tight junctions form the blood testis barrier (BTB) and have been suggested to play a role in isolating differentiated cells in the adluminal compartment from secreted factors by the interstitial tissue and vasculature neighboring the basal compartment.
Molecular Mechanisms of SSC maintenance and activity
The basement membrane of the seminiferous tubule is a modified form of extracellular matrix composed of fibronectin, collagens, and laminin. β1- integrin is expressed on the surface of SSCs and is involved in their adhesion to the laminin component of the basement membrane although other adhesion molecules are likely also implicated in the attachment of SSCs to the basement membrane. E cadherin expression on SSCs in mice, unlike in Drosophila, have been shown to be dispensable as the transplantation of cultured SSCs lacking E-cadherin are able to colonize host seminiferous tubules and undergo spermatogenesis. In addition the blood testis barrier provides architectural support and is composed of tight junction components such as occludins, claudins and zonula occludens (ZOs) which show dynamic expression during spermatogenesis. For example, claudin 11 has been shown to be a necessary component of these tight junctions as mice lacking this gene have a defective blood testis barrier and do not produce mature spermatozoa.
Molecular signals regulating SSC renewal
GDNF (Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor) is known to stimulate self-renewal of SSCs and is secreted by the sertoli cells under the influence of gonadotropin FSH. GDNF is a related member of the TGFβ superfamily of growth factors and when overexpressed in mice, an increase in undifferentiated spermatogonia was observed which led to the formation of germ tumours. In corroboration for its role as a renewal factor, heterozygous knockout male mice for GDNF show decreased spermatogenesis that eventually leads to infertility. In addition the supplementation of GDNF has been shown to extend the expansion of mouse SSCs in culture. However, it should be noted that the GDNF receptor c-RET and co-receptor GFRa1 are not solely expressed on the SSCs but also on Apaired and Aaligned, therefore showing that GDNF is a renewal factor for Asingle to Aaligned in general rather than being specific to the Asingle SSC population. FGF2 (Fibroblast growth factor -2), secreted by sertoli cells, has also been shown to influence the renewal of SSCs and undifferentiated spermatogonia in a similar manner to GDNF.
Although sertoli cells appear to play a major role in renewal, it expresses receptors for testosterone that is secreted by Leydig cells whereas germ cells do not contain this receptor- thus alluding to an important role of Leydig cells upstream in mediating renewal. Leydig cells also produce CSF 1 (Colony stimulating factor -1) for which SSCs strongly express the receptor CSF1R. When CSF 1 was added in culture with GDNF and FGF2 no further increase in proliferation was observed, however, the longer the germ cells remained in culture with CSF-1 the greater the SSC density observed when these germ cells were transplanted into host seminiferous tubules. This showed CSF 1 to be a specific renewal factor that tilts the SSCs towards renewal over differentiation, rather than affecting proliferation of SSCs and spermatogonia. Interesting, GDNF, FGF 2 and CSF 1 have also been shown to influence self-renewal of stem cells in other mammalian tissues.
Plzf (Promyelocytic leukaemia zinc finger) has also been implicated in regulating SSC self-renewal and is expressed by Asingle , Apaired and Aaligned spermatogonia. Plzf directly inhibits the transcription of a receptor, c-kit, in these early spermatogonia. However, its absence in late spermatogonia permits c-kit expression, which is subsequently activated by its ligand SCF (stem cell factor) secreted by sertoli cells, resulting in further differentiation. Also, the addition of BMP4 and Activin-A have shown to reduce self renewal of SSCs in culture and increase stem cell differentiation, with BMP4 shown to increase the expression of c-kit.
Aging of the SSC Niche
Prolonged spermatogenesis relies on the maintenance of SSCs, however, this maintenance declines with age and leads to infertility. Mice between 12 and 14 months of age show decreased testis weight, reduced spermatogenesis and SSC content. Although stem cells are regarded as having the potential to infinitely replicate in vitro, factors provided by the niche are crucial in vivo. Indeed serial transplantation of SSCs from male mice of different ages into young mice 3 months of age, whose endogenous spermatogenesis had been ablated, was used to estimate stem cell content given that each stem cell would generate a colony of spermatogenesis. The results of this experiment showed that transplanted SSCs could be maintained far longer than their replicative lifespan for their age. In addition, a study also showed that SSCs from young fertile mice could not be maintained nor undergo spermatogenesis when transplanted into testes of old, infertile mice. Together, these results points towards a deterioration of the SSC niche itself with aging rather than the loss of intrinsic factors in the SSC.
Vertebrate Adult stem cell niches
Vertebrate hematopoietic stem cells niche in the bone marrow is formed by cells subendosteal osteoblasts, sinusoidal endothelial cells and bone marrow stromal (also sometimes called reticular) cells which includes a mix of fibroblastoid, monocytic and adipocytic cells.
B. Hair follicle stem cell niche
The bulge area at the junction of arrectores pili muscle to the hair follicle sheath has been shown to host the skin stem cells with maximum span of developmental potential. There cells are maintained by signaling in concert with niche cells - signals include paracrine (e.g. sonic hedgehog), autocrine and juxtacrine signals.
C. Intestinal stem cell niche
The subepithelial fibroblast/myofibroblast network which surround the intestinal crypts constitute the niche.
Cardiovascular stem cell niches can be found within the right ventricular free wall, atria and outflow tracks of the heart. They are composed of Isl1+/Flk1+ cardiac progenitor cells(CPCs) that are localized into discrete clusters within a ColIV and laminin extracellular matrix(ECM). ColI and fibronectin are predominantly found outside the CPC clusters within the myocardium. Immunohistochemical staining has been used to demonstrate that differentiating CPCs, which migrate away from the progenitor clusters and into the ColI and fibronectin ECM surrounding the niche, down-regulate Isl1 while up-regulating mature cardiac markers such as troponin C. There is a current controversy over the role of Isl1+ cells in the cardiovascular system. While major publications have identified these cells as CPC's and have found a very large number in the murine and human heart, recent publications have found very few Isl1+ cells in the murine fetal heart and attribute their localization to the sinoatrial node, which is known as an area that contributes to heart pacemaking. The role of these cells and their niche are under intense research and debate.
Cancer tissue is morphologically heterogenous, not only due to the variety of cell types present, endothelial, fibroblast and various immune cells, but cancer cells themselves are not a homogenous population either. In accordance with the hierarchy model of tumours, the Cancer Stem Cells (CSC) are maintained by biochemical and physical contextual signals emanating from the microenvironment, called the cancer stem cell niche. The CSC niche is very similar to normal stem cells niche (Embryonic Stem Cell (ESC), Adult Stem Cell ASC) in function (maintaining of self-renewal, undifferentiated state and ability to differentiate) and in signalling pathways (Activin/Noda, Akt/PTEN, JAK/STAT, PI3-K, TGF-β, Wnt and BMP). It is hypothesized that CSCs arise form aberrant signalling of the microenvironment and participates not only in providing survivals signals to CSCs but also in metastasis by induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT). Apart EMT there are further homeostatic processes that contribute to the regulation of cancer stem cells such as inflammation, hypoxia and angiogenesis. Thus this microenvironment seems to be important for primary tumour growth as well as metastasis formation but also for tumour therapy.
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition is a morphogenetic process, normally occurs in embryogenesis that is “hijack” by cancer stem cell to detaching from primary place and migrate to another one. The dissemination is followed by reverse transition so-called Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (MET). This process is regulated by CSCs microenvironment via the same signalling pathways as in embryogenesis using the growth factors (TGF-β, PDGF, EGF), cytokine IL-8 and extracellular matrix components. A characteristic of EMT is loss of the epithelial markers (E-cadherin, cytokeratins, claudin, occluding, desmoglein, desmocolin) and gain of mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin, vimentin, fibronectin). There is also certain degree of similarity in homing-mobilization of normal stem cells and metastasis-invasion of cancer stem cells. There is an important role of Matrix MetalloProteinases (MMP), the principal extracellular matrix degrading enzymes, thus for example matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 are induced to expression and secretion by stromal cells during metastatsis of colon cancer via direct contact or paracrine regulation. The next sharing molecule is Stromal cell-Derived Factor-1 (SDF-1).
The EMT and cancer progression can be triggered also by chronic inflammation. The main roles have molecules (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, NFκB, TGF-β, HIF-1α) which can regulate both processes through regulation of downstream signalling that overlapping between EMT and inflammation. The downstream pathways involving in regulation of CSCs are Wnt, SHH, Notch, TGF-β, RTKs-EGF, FGF, IGF, HGF. NFκB regulates the EMT, migration and invasion of CSCs through Slug, Snail and Twist. The activation of NFκB leads to increase not only in production of IL-6, TNF-α and SDF-1 but also in delivery of growth factors. The source of the cytokine production are lymphocytes (TNF-α), Mesenchymal Stem Cells (SDF-1, IL-6, IL8). Interleukin 6 mediates activation of STAT3. The high level of STAT3 was described in isolated CSCs from liver, bone, cervical and brain cancer. The inhibition of STAT3 results in dramatic reduction in their formation. Generally IL-6 contributes a survival advantage to local stem cells and thus facilitates tumorigenesis. SDF-1α secreted from Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) has important role in homing and maintenance of Hematopoetic Stem Cell (HSC) in bone marrow niche but also in homing and dissemination of CSC.
Hypoxic[disambiguation needed] condition in stem cell niches (ESC, ASC or CSC) is necessary for maintaining stem cells in an undifferentiated state and also for minimalizing of DNA damage via oxidation. The maintaining of hypoxic state is under control of Hypoxia-Inducible transcription Factors (HIFs). HIFs contribute to tumour progression, cell survival and metastasis by regulation of target genes as VEGF, GLUT-1, ADAM-1, Oct4 and Notch. In the hypoxic condition there is an increase of intracellular Reactive Oxygen Radicals (ROS) which also promote CSCs survival via stress response.
Hypoxia is a main stimulant for angiogenesis and HIF-1α its mediator. Angiogenesis induced after hypoxic condition is called “Angiogenic switch”. HIF-1 promotes expression of angiogenic factors Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), basic Fibroblast Growth Facotr (bFGF), Placenta-Like Growth Factor (PLGF), Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) and Epidermal Growth Factor. But there is also evidence that the expression of angiogenic agens by cancer cells is also HIF-1 independent. It seems that there is an important role of ras and intracellular levels of calcium regulate the expression of angiogenic genes in response to hypoxia. The angiogenic switch downregulates angiogenesis suppressor proteins, such as thrombospondin, angiostatin, endostatin and tumstatin. Angiogenesis is necessary process for the primary tumour growth.
During Injury, support cells are able to activate a program for repair, recapitulating aspects of development in the area of damage. These areas become permissive for stem cell renewal, migration and differentiation. For instance in the CNS, injury is able to activate a developmental program in astrocytes that allow them to express molecules that support stem cells such as chemokines i.e SDF-1 and morphogens such as sonic hedgehog.
- Li, L., & Xie, T. (2005). Stem cell niche: structure and function. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology , 21, 605-31.
- Xie, T., & Spradling, A. (2000).A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science, 290, 328-330.
- Lin, H., Yue, L., Spradling, A.C. (1994) The Drosophila fusome, a germline-specific organelle, contains membrane skeletal proteins and functions in cyst formation. Development, 120, 947-956.
- Song, X., Wong, M., Kawase, E., Xi, R., Ding, B., McCarthy, J. (2004). Bmp signals from niche cells directly repress transcription of a differetiation-promoting gene, bag of marbles,in germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development. 131,1353-64.
- Chen, D., McKearin, D. (2003). Dpp signaling silences bam transcription directly to establish asymmetric divisions of germline stem cells. Current Biology,13 (20), 1786-91.
- Xie, T., & Spradling, A. (2000). A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science,290, 328-330.
- Cox, D.N., Chao, A., Lin, H. (2000). Piwi encodes a nucleoplasmic factor whose activity modulates the number and division rate of germline stem cells. Development.127, 503-14.
- Song, X., Zhu, C.H., Doan, C., Xie, T. (2002) Germline Stem Cells Anchored by Adherens Junctions in the Drosophila ovary niches. Science, 296(5574), 1855-57.
- Bogard, N., Lan, L., Xu, J., Cohen, R. (2007). Rab11 maintains connections between germline stem cells and niche cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development, 134(19), 3413-8.
- Gilboa, L., Forbes, A., Tazuke, S.I, Fuller, M.T., Lehmann, R. (2003). Germline stem cell differentiation in Drosophila requires gap junctions and proceeds via an intermediate state. Development. 13. 6625-34.
- Drummond-Barbosa, D., & Spradling, A. (2001). Stem cells and their progeny respond to nutritional changes during Drosophila oogenesis. Developmental Biology ,231 (1), 265-78.
- Hsu, H.J., & Drummond-Barbosa, D. (2009). Insulin levels control female germline stem cell maintenance via the niche in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 106 (4), 1117-21.
- Margolis, J., & Spradling, A. (1995). Identification and behavior of epithelial stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development , 121, 3797-3807.
- Xie, T., & Spradling, A. (1998). Dpp Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Ovary. Cell , 94 (2), 251-260.
- Kai, T., & Spradling, A. (2003). An empty Drosophila stem cell niche reactivates the proliferation of ectopic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 100, 4633-4638.
- Zhao, R., Xuan, Y., Li, X., & Xi, R. (2008). Age-related changes of germline stem cell activity, niche signaling activity and egg production in Drosophila. Aging Cell , 7 (3), 344-54.
- Pan, L., Chen, S., Weng, C., Call, G., Zhu, D., Tang, H., et al. (2007). Stem cell aging is controlled both intrinsically and extrinsically in the Drosophila ovary. Cell Stem Cell , 1 (4), 458-69.
- Oatley JM1, Brinster RL. The germline stem cell niche unit in mammalian testes. Physiol Rev. 2012 Apr;92(2):52-95.
- Griswold MD1, Oatley JM. Concise review: Defining characteristics of mammalian spermatogenic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2013 Jan;31(1):8-11
- de Rooij DG. The spermatogonial stem cell niche. Microsc Res Tech. 2009 Aug;72(8):580-5
- Bowles J1, Koopman P. Retinoic acid, meiosis and germ cell fate in mammals. Development. 2007 Oct;134(19):3401-11
- Rex A. Hess and Luiz Renato de Franca. Spermatogenesis and Cycle of the Seminiferous Epithelium CHAPTER1 Molecular Mechanisms in Spermatogenesis. Edited by C. Yan Cheng. ©2008 Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media.
- Kanatsu-Shinohara M1, Shinohara T. Spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:163-87
- Shosei Yoshida. Stem Cell Niche System in Mouse Spermatogenesis. Male Germline Stem Cells: Developmental and Regenerative Potential. Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine 2011, pp 159-175
- Chihara M1, Otsuka S et al. Molecular dynamics of the blood-testis barrier components during murine spermatogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010 Jul;77(7):630-9
- Ryu BY1, Orwig KE et al. Effects of aging and niche microenvironment on spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cells. 2006 Jun;24(6):1505-11
- Schenke-Layland, K., et al. (2011). Recapitulation of the embryonic cardiovascular progenitor cell niche. Biomaterials , 32(1), 2748-56
- Weinberger F., et al. (2012). Localization of Islet-1–Positive Cells in the Healthy and Infarcted. Circulation Research
- Van De Stolpe, A. (2013). "On the origin and destination of cancer stem cells: a conceptial evaluation". Am J Cancer Res.: 107–116.
- Cabarcas, SM; Mathews LA; Farrar WL (2011). "The cancer stem cell niche - there goes the neighborhood?". Int J Cancer: 2315–2327.
- Gout, S; Hout J (2008). "Role of cancer microenvironment in metastasis: focus on colon cancer". Cancer Microenviron.: 69–83.
- Li, L; Neaves WB (2006). "Normal stem cells and cancer stem cells: the niche matters". Cancer Res.: 4553–7.
- Borovski, T; De Sousa E Melo F, Vermeulen L, Medema JP (2011). "Cancer stem cell niche: the place to be". Cancer Res.: 634–639.
- Imitola J, Raddassi K, Park KI, Mueller FJ, Nieto M, Teng YD, Frenkel D, Li J, Sidman RL, Walsh CA, Snyder EY, Khoury SJ.Directed migration of neural stem cells to sites of CNS injury by the stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha/CXC chemokine receptor 4 pathway.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28;101(52):18117-22
- Wang Y, Imitola J, Rasmussen S, O'Connor KC, Khoury SJ.Paradoxical dysregulation of the neural stem cell pathway sonic hedgehog-Gli1 in autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis.Ann Neurol. 2008 Oct;64(4):417-27