Jump to content

Talk:2007–08 San Jose Sharks season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nominee2007–08 San Jose Sharks season was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 25, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

+/-

[edit]

Is the omission of Plus/Minus from the stats on purpose, or a mistake? V-train 21:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have any input on this? Otherwise I'll just add it in. V-train 19:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendations

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?] Enlarged
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
  • This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?] Added images
  • If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?] None
  • You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) Already one.
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?] All removed
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long – consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?] Per all other season articles.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] All removed.

*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?] Done

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, LegoKontribsTalkM 00:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2007–08 San Jose Sharks season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  • Comment from just a quick look, the records in the Log need fixed, as there are no ties. 0-0-0-0 should be just 0-0-0. Grsztalk 23:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment Honestly, if I was reviewing this, I probably would quick fail it. A lot of good work has gone into it, but it doesn't look done. There is nothing in the pre-season, draft, transactions and minor league affiliates sections, and the lead needs a great deal of expansion to encompass each section. I'd recommend withdrawing the GA nom for now, filling out the prose in these sections, then re-nominating. Resolute 04:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Preseason game log

[edit]

I have created a preseason game log in my userspace and it has one game listed that 19 attended. I got that from the NHL website [1]. What should I put? Also, this game doesn't have an attendance either. LegoKontribsTalkM 05:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously a typo on the NHL's part. The attendance was 19,289. Calgary's sold out every game since 2004, even pre-season games. Resolute 14:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2007–08 San Jose Sharks season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007–08 San Jose Sharks season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007–08 San Jose Sharks season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]