Talk:2010 NCAA Division I women's basketball tournament

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Basketball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's basketball task force.

Trenton site

The list of first round sites includes Trenton. This location is found on an NCAA press release, however, it is not listed on the NCAA page listing future sites. I've written to the NCAA for clarification, and will follow-up based upon the answer.

In any case, a reference should be added - my view is that the NCAA listing of sites is a better reference than a press release, but as that source is in conflict with the existing info, I'll wait to hear an answer before adding a reference.Sphilbrick (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UConn

Can't we just list them as the champion now? haha... --Airtuna08 (talk) 18:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see Stanford take apart Georgia? --SPhilbrick T 23:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope Stanford beats them, but that UConn team was biologically produced in some lab. --Airtuna08 (talk) 22:14, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bold convention

The schools are all wikilinked in the bracket, so I did not wikilink any of them in the game summaries. However, to aid readers who might be looking for a particular school, I bolded the first instance of each school in the summary.--SPhilbrick T 17:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

citation needed

The Determine procedure section had an assertion "...with the committee ostensibly making every region as comparable to the others as possible." That was followed by a citation needed. I added a link to the 2023 principles and procedures. While ideally it would be best to link to the document in existence in 2010, the product principles are unchanged. Obviously the numbers are different with 68 teams now and 64 then, and while there are two locations for regionals rather than four, the two locations each host two distinct "regionals", so the admonition that they ought to be in relative balance is a principle or procedure that has not changed between 2010 and 2023 (a for that matter since the first NCAA tournament in 1982) S Philbrick (Talk) 02:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found a better option. This link

The exact same text in the quote is in that version, and that revision is only three years removed from the relevant year. S Philbrick (Talk) 17:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]