Talk:2011 Wimbledon Championships – Women's doubles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lucky Losers to replace Arn/Hercog[edit]

Have Erakovic/Tanasugarn been confirmed as lucky losers? Because ITF have other rules for the grand slam tournaments than what is used on the ATP or WTA tour. One of the four highest ranked players/teams who lost in the last qualifying round will be drawn at random to determine the lucky loser spot. Therefore Erakovic/Tanasugarn are not guaranteed the spot, even if they are the highest ranked team who failed to qualify.Xerxes53 (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 Wimbledon Championships – Women's Doubles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]