Talk:8 mm caliber

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

"7.92mm" designation of unknown source[edit]

In Talk:8x57_IS#7.92mm_dispute, the designation of German 8mm calibres as "7.92" are tried to be resolved and sourced. --Dingo (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.32 Colt should be here[edit]

.32 Colt needs added/linkedMzmadmike (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"7.92" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect 7.92 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 31 § 7.92 until a consensus is reached. Okmrman (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]