Talk:Arabtec Holding PJSC

United Arab Emirates: Dubai Low‑importance

	United Arab Emirates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Dubai (assessed as Low-importance).

Neutral point of view & reliable references[edit]

Arabtec receives a significant amount of press coverage, but none of that is reflected in the current version of this article. A quick glance through the history shows that it seems to have been a bit more balanced in the past. I'm concerned that the most recent revisions appear to rely solely on the company's own website. I've tagged the article to reflect this, and hope to dig into it more when I've got a bit of time. I'd appreciate input from others. katherine_a (talk) 07:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a data point, Brookfield Multiplex is not a bad example of a more balanced article on a company in this sector. katherine_a (talk) 07:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody got rid of the controversies section - this may have been an actual employee who got rid of the controversies and replaced it with an awards section?

Nonetheless, protection for this page should be considered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSP232 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism against the company[edit]

Be sure that some kind of criticism section stays in the article. I see that the article has also had controversies section a year ago.. This page should be protected. Probios (talk) 18:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, the criticism-section has been removed again. Don't let these slave-abusing businessmen win the edit war. http://www.vice.com/video/the-slaves-of-dubai — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.92.98.162 (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The controversies and criticism section keeps being removed! This page needs to be protected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.114.42 (talk) 19:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

uoi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.71.134.90 (talk) 12:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Arabtec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]