Talk:Omura's whale

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

confirmation of the validity of B. omurai

The validity of Balaenoptera omurai has been confirmed by DNA analysis (Sasaki et. al., 2006). According to their DNA analysis, B. omurai is more derived than the blue whale, but more primitive than the sei and Bryde's whales. Additionally, B. edeni and B. brydei are closer to each other than either is to the sei whale or B. omurai. Therefore, this article must be updated and title of this article should be changed to Omura's Whale. This will update the Wikipedia article Bryde's Whale

Sasaki, T., Nikaido, M., Wada, S., Yamada, T.K., Cao, Y., Hasegawa, M., and Okada, N. 2006. Balaenoptera omurai is a newly discovered baleen whale that represents an ancient evolutionary lineage. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41(1): 40–52. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.61.237 (talk) 03:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, per above, and Jefferson et al (2008), which labels the species Omura's whale. The page will be moved as agreed. OldBabyBlue (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Map and images needed

Yeah, I don't know how to make a map on here, so anyone feel free to make one. Only include its actual distribution though. We could include small blue areas where several strandings/catches have occurred (southern Japan, the west coast of Taiwan, the Bohol Sea). A star could be placed where the type specimen was found and perhaps an asterisk where confirmed sightings have occurred (Komodo National Park, southern New Caledonia). The only map on WikiCommons is outdated and inaccurate, showing it in places it has never been confirmed to occur (most of Indonesia, etc.). Images may be harder to come by. Perhaps the best we could do would be to find a free image of a museum specimen. Any help would be much appreciated. SHFW70 (talk) 01:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Size comparison chart needed

Someone with inkscape and more patience than me needs to upload an Omura's whale size comparison chart. All you need to do is take the Bryde's whale size comparison chart, remove the lateral ridge, give it a more hooked dorsal fin, and scale the 1.8 m diver to a 11.5 m whale. SHFW70 (talk) 19:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First confirmed wild sighting of _B.omurai_

http://www.whoi.edu/news-release/OmurasWhales Figured I'd post this here, since it's not currently documented in the article itself. As of October 22nd of this year, we have the first confirmed sightings of live, wild Omura's whales. Raptormimus456 (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true. They had been sighted off Komodo in 1999 and 2000 and off Madagascar in 1994. The authors were just lazy and didn't bother do enough research. OM2003 (talk) 19:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Omura's whale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611112003/http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/Appendices_COP9_E.pdf to http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/Appendices_COP9_E.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]