Talk:2006 Belgian local elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Imperiali quota vs. Imperiali highest average[edit]

Imperiali quota / largest remainder isn't the same as Imperiali highest average. In Belgian local elections the Imperiali highest average method is used (divisor series 2, 3, 4, ...) and not the Imperiali quota ( quota=votes/(seats+2) ). I'm sorry it's confusing that both methods are named "Imperiali"... Imperiali quota has a page of its own, Imperiali highest average is mentioned on the higest average page, but may be it deserves its own page (like D'Hondt and Sainte-Lague highest average methods) - with a disambiguation offcourse --Bancki 06:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Results coverage[edit]

How are we going to display the results? It's quite impossible to do this for all municipalities, and there will be no official summarizing results. On the other hand, adding only the most interesting places could be a misrepresentation... Any ideas, anyone? Belection06 16:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need official results, we can use the summaries the press will be making, and later on the scientific studies, if we can lay our hands on them (and our span of attention is still ... spanning).

One thing we can't do, because it would be WP:OR, is summarize the official results ourselves. --LucVerhelst 16:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just pick a couple of municipalities which are at their own are important (like Ghent and Leuven) or those that show drastic changes in results. Intangible 20:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vlaanderenkiest.jpg[edit]

Image:Vlaanderenkiest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo elections2006.jpg[edit]

Image:Logo elections2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Belgian local elections, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]