Talk:Benjamin Geen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apparent bias in the presentation of the article?[edit]

The entry reads as if it were written by the London Innocence Project/Geen's defense team. While it should obviously cover the appeal, the terse description of the actual crime, the use of the passive voice, and other aspects of the description basically make it sound as if Geen were an innocent bystander who just happened to get arrested for these deaths. Also, the very limited amount of space given to the crime and trial v. the space given to the appeal makes the article appear to be advocating the perspective that Geen is wrongfully accused at the expense of the notion that he may have committed the crimes. It is not Wikipedia's job to take a position -- it is supposed to serve as a repository of facts. I think the pre-appeal section needs beefing up and rewriting in addition to citation, which is needed everywhere. Marguerite de Navarre (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think that the prosecution case needs to be outlined in more detail, and more attention should be given to the conduct of the trials and the role of the media. Richard Gill (talk) 12:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.murderuk.com/one_off_benjamin_geen.html
Triggered by \bmurderuk\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag. No further action is necessary.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)== External links modified ==[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Benjamin Geen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100327140428/http://www.freebengeen.org:80/ to http://www.freebengeen.org
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100327140428/http://www.freebengeen.org:80/ to http://www.freebengeen.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Research shows that medical workers who are given such nicknames by others are often later found to have harmed patients"[edit]

Research also shows that such medical workers are later found to have been innocent. About 10% of convictions of a nurse for serial killings, when the nurse has always claimed to have been innocent, later turn out to have been miscarriages of justice. And that's only counting the cases when a re-opening of the case does actually happen. "The system" has a lot of ways to obstruct that ever happening. Richard Gill (talk) 08:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]