Talk:Anba Angaelos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Bishop Angaelos)

Use of the terms His Grace, Their Grace, His Holiness, etc. Is non-encyclopedic and such terms are not in use in articles dealing with other religious figures. They do not conform to wikiusage and are inappropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.192.65.5 (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well they are encyclopaedic terms as they denote the ranks of the Holy synod in religion.They are therefore part of a status. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jojost14 (talkcontribs) 10:38, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For anybody who comes here for guidance, guideline WP:NCCL says very clearly "Honorifics such as "His Holiness" should ordinarily not be used in naming clergy". (Similar guidelines hold for monarchs, aristocrats, diplomats, etc.) Pol098 (talk) 22:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

I'm confused, it says Bishop Angaelos is his birth name. Surely "bishop" is only a title, I've never heard of it as a personal name before. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 21:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name (Anba) added with source. Known as Anba Angaelos, don't know if Angaelos is birth surname. Pol098 (talk) 16:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, name is Angaelos and title after ordination is Archbishop Angaelos and not Anba Angaelos

Kwagdi (talk) 00:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article name change[edit]

This article's name should be changed, following guideline WP:NCCL, from "Bishop Angaelos" to "Anba Angaelos". This is very much the usual usage, in addition to being covered by a guideline; e.g. the (Anglican) Archbishop of Canterbury's article is Justin Welby. Pol098 (talk) 22:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(It was done a while ago.) Pol098 (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Archbishop Angaelos Kwagdi (talk) 23:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Bishop Angaelos[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Bishop Angaelos which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.companydirectorcheck.com/anba-angaelos
    Triggered by \bcompanydirectorcheck\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Text supported by this reference is now supported by a Companies House source. Pol098 (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anba Angaelos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major style and content issues[edit]

The introductory paragraphs are excessively laudatory and not particularly encyclopaedic. Further, honorifics (His Grace), are used throughout, not conforming to style. The article requires a rewrite from sources not intimately related to the subject. 79.66.167.113 (talk) 05:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resumé tag removed[edit]

I've removed a good deal of copyrighted materia, especially this praiseful text, so I think the "written like a resumé" tag is no longer needed. I believe the removals also address the various complaints above that the text is "excessively laudatory". It's no wonder it was, when so much of it was from (and not just sourced to) the subject's own website. Bishonen | talk 07:07, 21 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

I have restored the tag as the article still has two sections which are extensive lists of positions/roles, largely unsourced, which read like a resume much more than an encyclopedia article. Thanks Melcous (talk) 11:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]