Talk:Borisav Jović

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:NAM Identificador.jpg[edit]

The image File:NAM Identificador.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poslednji dani SFRJ[edit]

While the BBC documentary definitely takes quotes out of context and mistranslates in its subtitles (Jović complained about that before the ICTY, too), Jović's 1995 book may provide much more incriminating evidence against him and Milošević, judging from the quotations from it, and if they aren't extremely, almost unthinkably skillfully taken out of context (in contrast to the rather rough tricks of the BBC film). It would appear then that both Jović and Veljko Kadijević were much more sincere in their publications in the early 1990s, when the outcome of the whole "adventure" was still unclear, than in their more recent writings and statements. I don't have access to that book, the most detailed online references to it seem to be here and here If the details and the citations were to be verified, I think it would make sense to put them in the article, and even in the Milošević and FRY articles.--91.148.159.4 (talk) 19:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In English, I find this elaborate and useful essay, with a huge amount of extensive quotations: Part I, Part II. Of course, this too is for information purposes; it is clearly a random online secondary source in a situation that calls for the primary ones. --91.148.159.4 (talk) 21:26, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]