Talk:Boxfresh
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Coffeehorse (talk · contribs) on 22 June 2010 with the comment: This article refers to a non-notable commercial entity. There is more than one 'boxfresh' (UK clothing label, AUS produce merchant, DE footwear manufacturer), all of equal notability. Either all should have an article, with this page existing as a redirect, or none should. While factual, there is obvious commercial bias in this article - it exists only to increase the notability of said content It was contested by Michig (talk · contribs) with the comment: deprod - see talk page. Irrelevant websites of similarly-named but unrelated companies removed from external links |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
No references to 'box-fresh' as slang can be found prior to 1989, when the company was formed. This should be deleted. First referenced in The Concide New Partrige Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English as:
boxfresh: adjective of shoes, especially trainers, unworn UK, 2003[1]
Article proposed for deletion as not notable or meeting wikipedia's quality guidelines. Unless somebody wants to provide citations, create a splitter page and reference Boxfresh.com.au (referenced here in Australia by Channel 7, Channel 9, Sunday Night (TV show), Sydney Morning Herald (largest newspaper in australia) and The Sydney Magazine, as Boxfresh (Produce Purveyor) or similar and change this page to Boxfresh (Apparel), I see deleting this page as the only way to preserve Wikipedia quality guidelines.
Coffeehorse (talk) 07:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Notability[edit]
These from the first few pages of Google News results demonstrate notability:
- Daily Telegraph
- AskMen
- Glasgow Herald
- Glasgow Herald - not in preview but article discusses Boxfresh's graffiti-style advertising.--Michig (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)