Talk:British Asian Cup/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 17:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I'll review this and I think there are a few issues that needs addressing.

1. The lead pic needs a caption  Done
2. Should at least say that Lord's is in England (I know it's obvious but you have to consider the reader who knows little)  Done
3. It was only one match so it shouldn't be described as a series  Done
4. Players when they are first mentioned should have their Christian names and their surnames before using only their surnames afterwards (example: Tanvir in the Build up section)  Done
5. Who decided to move the 2009 CL to South Africa?  Done
6. "and was a day/night one." sound better to say it was a day/night match in my opinion

•  Done Used event instead of match as match has been already used in the sentence.

1. "Fazal and Asnodkar reached to a 50 run partnership", shouldn't have that to in there  Done
2. Why were the Royals awarded penalty runs?

• Because the ball was deflected by the wicket-keeper's helmet (I have written this)

1. The pic of Warne seems a bit oversized to me  Done
2. Ref 1: What makes burrp.com a reliable source (I'm just asking as I've never come across it before)

•  Done Removed

1. Ref 3: IANS or Cricinfo?  Done
2. It should also have an explanation as to why this wasn't made into an annual event

• None of the sources say anything about that.

1. Check against the previous GA review too  Done

Once these have been sorted, I'll take another look at it. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I do think that if you want improve the article, it would be helpful to find out why this wasn't made into a regular event. Nevertheless, I am happy that this fulfills the GA criteria. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)