Talk:Business relationship management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikignome checking in[edit]

I provided some HotCat work and a few more links in and out of the article along with additional refs. I'd recommend that the intro should be boiled down to 2-3 sentences. See for example Release Management or Project Management for examples. Aim for an intro that could be quickly understood by someone completely separate from the field.

ejly (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do as I SAY![edit]

Suggestions for improving the BRM article. According to Wikipedia's process, the community needs to address the following issues:

The introduction provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject - The current introduction states:

Business relationship management is a formal approach to understanding, defining, and supporting a broad spectrum of inter-business activities related to providing and consuming knowledge and services via networks, with an emphasis on the emergence of online networks as a primary medium through which business relationships are conducted.

Business relationship management (BRM) is distinct from, but related to, concepts such as ERM and CRM. It also exceeds the scope of the limited context of describing a liaison who aligns business interests with IT deliverables.[1]

BRM seeks to provide a complete and holistic model of business relationships and business relationship value over time, in order to make the various aspects of business relationships both explicit and measurable. A mature BRM model will ultimately support both:

  • strategic business research and development effort
  • tools and techniques that implement BRM principles


BRM as a discipline seeks to enable all stakeholders to develop, evaluate, and leverage high-value relationships throughout the network.

Please edit the page directly or suggest how authors can provide more context. What additional questions does the intro need to answer?

It is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.

Suggested approach includes contacting WikiProject Business and Economics or the Business and Economics Portal. I tagged the article so that it will be picked up by the Business and Economics WikiProject. I also added it to the Business and Economics Portal.


Very few or no other articles link to it.

Suggested approach is to introduce links to this page from other related articles. I added links from ERM and CRM pages.

Please link from additional related articles or suggest articles to link from and to.

It may need to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.

Suggested approach is to ensure that the article conforms to standards for internal and external links and formatting.

This is the low-priority area of concern; once the issues listed above are addressed, there may be some remaining minor cleanup to do.

Mavens08 (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC) dtewes[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Business relationship management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]