Talk:Cerrejonisuchus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Paleoenvironment illustration[edit]

File:TitanoboaCerrejonensis.jpg

This is a nice illustration of the Cerrejón paleoenvironment (made in 2008 and originally from the National Science Foundation website[1]) that includes a dyrosaurid. Does anyone know if this is Cerrejonisuchus? It was made a few months before Titanoboa was described in Nature, and the dyrosaurids of the Cerrejón Formation had not yet been described. According to the new paper, other dyrosaurids have been found from the formation that are distinct from Cerrejonisuchus, but have not yet been described. The dyrosaurid in the illustration could very well be one of those dyrosaurids, but if it really is Cerrejonisuchus, I'd like to include it in the article. Smokeybjb (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've included the image in the paleoenvironment section, but haven't mentioned what the dyrosaurid is. If anyone finds out that it is Cerrejonisuchus, I'll mention that in the caption. Smokeybjb (talk) 22:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cerrejonisuchus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]