Talk:Charge invariance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

charge invariance means - charge is not subject to (special) relativistic effects if you increase the speed of a (charged) mass, the charge on the mass does not change (unlike mass). charge is unaffected by speed. mass is called a relativistic quantity because it does change with speed. energy is also considered a relativistic quantity. "officially" (conventionally accepted), time slows down and length contracts (along line-of-flight). officially, these two are virtual effects. nothing really happens to time and space. but there is a chance convention is wrong about this assumption. there is a perspective that asserts these effects are real and links it with gravitation and the strong force within nuclei. what is this mysterious "force"? i call it temporal curvature and it is not really a force. it is what is says: curved time. within this perspective and including an associated assumption about space (elasticity), we find some surprising relations .. Charge invariance was my first contribution to wp and hopefully, this is not my last.. here is an important addendum: after 25 years, i finally found a researcher who is investigating elementary particles as elastic deformations in space-time - paralleling my own developments but much more formally. he may claim to be doing otherwise, but his work is Foundational in this realm. his name is Markus Lazar and you can find his papers at arXiv by clicking on his name. we are not associated in any way - so please do not tarnish his image by linking him with me. (i encountered this issue with a french associate who objected to my use of the word 'associate'.) i have recommended developing decisive tests to him and await his reply.. if his ideas survive the test of time and come to be recognized as central to the unification issue in physics, my work here will be largely done (at least in the physics realm) .. you can find some of my work at: temporal curvature and N and Omega. my name is sam micheal and i sincerely wish you a happy thanksgiving and merry christmas.&Delta (talk) 06:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification[edit]

could you clarify the last line in this wikipedia entry, "The property of charge invariance follows from the vanishing divergence of the charge-current four-vector j^\mu=(c\rho,{\vec j}), with \partial_\mu j^\mu=0."