Talk:Chiasm (anatomy)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 January 2020 by reviewer Tom (LT) (talk · contribs).

Anatomy: Neuroanatomy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Contralateral brain#axial twist hypothesis|axial twist hypothesis]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

AfC review[edit]

I believe this article is independently notable
No quick fail criteria evident
No copyvio identified

Article accepted.--Tom (LT) (talk) 07:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Major restructuring[edit]

I did some major restructuring and editing of the page. Thank you Tom (LT), for your quick first review of the page and many thanks for your feedback! Further comments and help are very welcome. Marci68 (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. Great to have another editor around.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have made some edits to make this article more standard in formatting and updated the navbox. In general, only the initial mention of the article is bold, or any terms that redirect to an article. The rest of the articles don't usually use too much italic or bold (also, your writing is clear enough without these). It is much more difficult to understand text when the cranial nerve numbers are mentioned after every nerve, so this has been deprecated on this site - there is no real need for tat here if you're linking to the article. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]