Talk:Christophe Neff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

deleted cleanup message, because categorization has been done, Pinus pinea 07:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 6.4.2007 9:26 (CEST)[reply]

Unsourced[edit]

  • Added tag due to the fact that the only link is the person's home page. None of the information is used from neutral sources. Neonblak 15:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is just to tell[edit]

that Mr Neff obviously has created his own article on Wiki, and not only in this language, but also in all the other versions wherein it exists. He'd better point it out himself instead of hiding behind (all too conspicuous) aliases. An attentive reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.122.5.60 (talk) 10:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

article about Christophe Neff[edit]

Yes it is true, I have created this article about Christophe Neff using the nom de plume Pinus pinea. Anybody who wants can start a delete discussion to get a decision to delete the article. Christophe.Neff (talk) 16:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

meinprof.de[edit]

INformation about Christophe Neff in meinprof.de (link [1] that could be included by a German speaking wikipedian. <...> Mr.K. (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I redacted the above comment per WP:BLP at the request of the subject. Will leave a note for User:Mr.K. Forum postings can't be used as sources for biographical articles. The website mentioned, meinprof.de, is a place where students can leave feedback about their professors. 06:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion and exclusion criteria[edit]

Hello.

I wonder if this page does meet criterium Article 7 for speedy deletion as well as not meet the notability inclusion criterium. Christophe -- not that I care! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xyzt1234 (talkcontribs) 17:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello again, Christopher. Thanks for your response in my talk page. I don't personally mind your article here; I was just wondering about the application of standards in wikipedia. I once started the stub on a world-known photographer (Kishin Shinoyama) and it almost went out in the very first days for lack of notability. Personally I prefer to include instead of deleting.

" The result was the forest fires risks will heavily increase – and this because of landabandonment, bushencroachment etc. – and not as a part of the portugese press is writing – because of climate warming. This absolutely false and nonsense."

Of course it's nonsense! But you know that the causes you mention are unpalatable and climate warming would have been better. On the other hand, I hardly ever get a letter to the editor published here (Portugal) if the ideas I present are not the ones that the media support. The single exception was a letter on the frauds of the passive smoking theory (you don't have to agree with me, of course! Smoking is a most terrible thing and must be quenched) in a secondary newspaper.

The article on Prince Henry isn't mine. I only noticed that the image, which is his traditional representation and appeared in the Saint Vincent Panels in the early 20th, is subject to dispute still today, and some think it's Philip the Good, husband of the Infanta Isabel.

There are many interesting are relatively unknown myths (read as 'interesting stories') about Portugal; such as the possibility of it being one of the 2-3 birthplaces of megalithic cultures (which then went to Somerset and so), it's relationship to the Knights Templar and the Benedictines via Bernard of Clairvaux, the Fifth Empire notion, etc... I don't feel able, at the moment, to write anything about the so-called School of Sagres, it's a very complex matter and, as you know, shrouded in the strategic secrecy of the epoch.

Regards, --Xyzt1234 (talk) 09:16, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unbiased article?[edit]

"Christophe Neff (born 10 June 1964 in Tübingen, Germany)"

This is how much of this article remains if all sources directly attributed to the concerned person are eliminated. (Personal Blog, Google+ Page). Further, it is doubtful if views on topics absolutely not related to the area of expertise are relevant enough to be included in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.143.73.235 (talk) 03:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christophe Neff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]