Talk:Cincinnati Reds (1876–1879)

Baseball: Old-time Base Ball / Reds Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cincinnati Reds (assessed as Mid-importance).

Change needed

The revelation that the 1880 season belongs to a separate franchise from this Cincinnati Reds needs a correction. This Reds club should be listed as 1876-1879. I've worked as much as possible to update this great site but the 1880 year needs to be omitted from this club as the records are starting to show, beginning with Retrosheet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCSRdotorg (talk • contribs) 04:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New revelations with this Reds club

Been doing a ton of research on the era of Cincinnati baseball from 1869 to 1899. The second incarnation of the Reds actually went fro 1876-1879. The 1880 season belonged to a new major league team called the Cincinnati Stars. The 1879 Reds disband, leaving a vacant NL spot. A semi-pro team called the Cincinnati Stars were admitted. Soooooo, a brand new team was added to the NL for the 1880 season. Over the years their stats were lumped into the second Reds club. Retrosheet agreed with my findings and corrected their records. If Wiki will let me, I can write an article correcting the records here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCSRdotorg (talk • contribs) 06:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

Same as 1882 team?

If someone can find a cite for the fact that this is the same team as the 1882 team that eventually became the Cincinnati Reds of today, it would be very useful. -Dewelar (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, the 1882 team-season page specifically states that the two teams were unrelated. I'm putting up a disputed tag on that piece of information. -Dewelar (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The team had some of the same players, but a different ownership. It is usually regarded as a separate franchise. The franchise that began play in 1882 in the American Association is regarded as the same franchise that still plays today. Sweaver5 (talk) 02:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1875 or 1876 as the birth of this Reds club ?

Should this Reds birth actually be listed as 1875 instead of 1876 ? The club was actually organized as an independent professional club during the summer of 1875. They played their first game on August 9th 1875. Here is a link to my website where I have the game posted. http://www.scsr.org/19CCBB/Teams/CR2/1875/BS/08/09.htm This independent club went on to join the new National League in 1876, playing in the League until 1880. SCSRdotorg (talk) 04:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cincinnati Reds (1876–80). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]