Talk:CityFlyer Express

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Incorrect" facts[edit]

Though I am not the author, I have reinserted the deleted paras by resaving the earlier versions because I have checked the facts contained in the sections that had been removed by reading through the references cited as well as additional source material I happened to chance upon the internet and old newspaper cuttings from The Business dating back to the time CityFlyer Express was taken over by British Airways (at the time The Business used to trade as The Sunday Business). According to the aforementioned source material, these statements are true although I have to admit that this represents the personal views of the authors/journalists who wrote the relevant sections/articles for their books/newspapers.

As for the relevance of British Airways's overall strategy for its operation at London Gatwick during that time, I am of the opinion that it is relevant because the franchise agreement between British Airways and CityFlyer Express was a central plank of that strategy. I have therefore decided to reinstate it as well.

I have furthermore added the most relevant article, which appeared in The Sunday Business on Oct. 22/3, 2000, to the "References" section as well as appropriate citations to this article.

Pimpom123 14:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have added further relevant sources and citations as references as well.

Pimpom123 09:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation?[edit]

Qantas in Australia also operates a service called CityFlyer between the major capital cities in Australia. Right now, the CityFlyer page redirects to this one (CityFlyer Express). Should we create a disambiguation page at CityFlyer to avoid confusion between the two services? I was looking for info on the Qantas service. Thoughts? Jpp42 06:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CityFlyer Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050406150255/http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/1999/430ba.htm to http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/1999/430ba.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]