Talk:Clifton, Bristol

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Bristol Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article has a map
	This article has an infobox

Clifton and Clifton East?[edit]

Shouldn't this be split into Clifton and Clifton East? A lot of what is claimed for Clifton actually falls into Clifton East - see http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/ward-finder.en?XSL=warddetail&WardId=34 tomburnell 14:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No-one in the actual real world ever actually refers to Clifton East, though, surely? 'East' seems just to be a political dividing line for the purpose of holding elections. The only Cliftons I hear and talk about are Clifton in the generic (starting somewhere around the fountains in the centre) and Clifton Village in the particular. 'Clifton East' isn't a useful classification, I don't think. Splash - tk 14:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, those designations are for local administration purposes only, and they bear no real relation to every day use of the term "Clifton", nor are they an attempt to redefine the area's boundaries. Indeed, the council merely named them after Clifton for convenience -- they could have named them "Bristol City Council Ward Number 11" and "Bristol City Council Ward Number 12". By all means, start a "Politics and administration" section to describe the fact that the area contains two City Council Wards, and the dividing line between them, but there's no need to split the article. We don't just deal with formal divisions, we also have to deal with the everyday informal divisions -- hence why we mention Filton on the Bristol article, even though it's not in the official boundaries, and why we have articles about informal areas like West Country and home counties, which have no formal definitions. Joe D (t) 18:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

"Just Clifton" Removed site "Just Clifton", site appers to be under construction. Will be linking back to this site upon completion, as this site appears to have potential.(Questioning whether this site should be included as a community website, as it seems to be only a Wordpress blog?(Thoughts wanted please).

Map of Clifton circa 1990 See no real point linking to this map, as co-ordinates are provided at the top of the article page for this purpose. The map is also out of date by 19 years and map graphics are of poor quality.

Recently removed BWLS Bristol orchestras link This site appeared to be in the making and like "Just Clifton", had potential for warranting site linkage. However, this site does not appear to be hosted 24/7, and therefore failing to be a practical resource. Although, if this technical issue can be ammended, I see no reason why not to link there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennyrand (talk • contribs) 10:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Removed the BWLS Site as link was not working. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Readmeandthis (talk • contribs) 09:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Amberley House School[edit]

This merger mandated by the recent AfD has now been completed. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"both one" in first sentence[edit]

Can somebody fix this, please?

"Clifton is a suburb of the City of Bristol in England, and the name of both one of the city's thirty-five council wards."

Maybe "Clifton is both a suburb of the City of Bristol in England and one of the city's thirty-five council wards."? —JerryFriedman (Talk) 17:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clifton, Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004203038/http://www2.glos.ac.uk/bgas/tbgas/v112/bg112073.pdf to http://www2.glos.ac.uk/bgas/tbgas/v112/bg112073.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clifton, Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323043856/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10368017 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10368017

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]