Talk:Baylor University basketball scandal

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Needs more references

I'm placing the refimprove tag on this page since the first reference appears more than halfway through the article. The entire section on the team murder has no references at all. Also I think the introduction (currently only one sentence) should be expanded to include the team murder case. PrBeacon (talk) 02:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up some

I tried to clean this up and source - much of the material on the murder (since removed from Dennehy & Dotson articles) was a copyvio so I trimmed and soured what I could. I remain concerned that some of the other sections are too closely worded to their sources, but it's a start. Also improved some of the sourcing and converted the URLs at the bottom into sources which makes for clearer reading StarM 01:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed an alleged opinion

I removed the strikethrough "Rouse sued his attorney in 2005 for releasing the incriminating tapes of Bliss, claiming that it breached the attorney–client privilege ~~(though that privilege doesn't apply when an attorney knows about potential criminal activity). "~~ because (1) What?! Privilege doesn't apply if the attorney knows about potential criminal activity? Doesn't every conversation you have with an attorney involve potential criminal activity? Isn't that precisely why privilege exists? But mostly because of (2), it doesn't appear in the referenced article. Jameywiki (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]