This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
added the fimography and sexual ability sections back into back into the entry.
Tabercil: the filmography may well be found at iafd but i think its just as relevent to place it here...other porn stars have listings of their filmographies listed so why shouldn't we have one for Debi Diamond? The list is still edited to suit inclusion into wikipedia- having notes about availability removed etc. 06:49.10th january 2006.
After looking at the Wiki entries for mainstream actors (e.g., John Wayne, Angelina Jolie), I can see they have filmographies. My concern with porn star lists is that the sheer volume of appearances they make. Many of the more popular stars can easily be in hundreds of movies, and if we were to add all of them to the biography we'll be violating the rule of thumb to keep entries to under 32K. Tabercil 15:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
i'd like to see a filmography for all those who should have one...but lets compromise, why not post up the top 50 films that someone has made...its not too many and it shows they have made a few films. this place is meant to be an encyclopedia so these facts should be here, even if they apperar in different forms on other sites. Geordiekimbo 19:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
I have no objection to a short filmography of notable appearances (as per Joe Beaudoin Jr.'s comment in his reversion of your edit). Notable does not mean "every appearance this actress has ever made". When you consider that according to IAFD Debi Diamond has (as of 1/20/05) 505 performer credits, a full filmography is simply an insane idea, and I think even 50 films would be too much. I mean, 10% of Debi's appearances are "notable"?? Let's use the AVN awards as a crude barometer of what's notable. For instance:
any sex scene for which Debi won an AVN award (e.g., The Chameleon won "Best Couples Sex Scene" in 1990 for a scene with Debi and Tom Byron), the film from which it came from can be on the filmography.
any sex scene for which Debi was nominated for an AVN award, the film from which it came from can be on the filmography.
any film/video for which Debi either won or was nominated for "Best Actress", the film can be on the filmography
any film which either won or was nominated for an overall award, the film can be on the filmography. Note that this means things like "Best Film", "Best Foreign Feature", or "Best Specialty Tape". E.g., Latex won the award for "Best Video" in 1996.
Films in which other people won awards for should not count. For instance, Sodomania 5 won "Best Anal Sex Scene - Video" in 1994 for a scene with Tiffany Mynx, Kitty Yung, and Randy West. While Debi did have a scene in it, this film should not be on her filmography unless one of the earlier rules can be shown to apply.
Is that a clear and reasonable enough set rules? Tabercil 00:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)