Talk:Derby Owners Club/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Someone[edit]

There is someone out there, that will remain nameless, that is editing the page and deleting, mispelling, or simply corrupting the URL links to the different websites. He is doing this out of maliciousness, as he is no longer welcome at doc.rbcb.net for causing issues there. He has also had run-ins with Sega, for trying to use SEGA as his website name.

It's sad, but true. 20:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.167.247.176 (talkcontribs) 20:12, 9 October 2007

The URL's[edit]

Definitely True, DOC.RBCB.NET forum is abusing this site.

The truth is not bent in my mind after reading their forum at the following link

http:// doc.rbcb.net/forums/General/thread/65142/2/



Keep in mind, that this site is abused by people from the internet web forum

DOC.RBCB.NET

THEY ARE MALICIOUSLY ATTACKING AND CHANGING THE GOOD THAT WIKIPEDIA BRINGS TO US ALL.

NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEY TRY TO CHANGE THE TRUTH, IT IS ON THEIR WEBSITE AT

http:// doc.rbcb.net/forums/General/view/65142/

GO ahead and see how they abuse Wikipedia and then gang up to laugh about it.

QUOTE (Shady Stables - PA)

Blame it all on a certain rep from the NY/NJ area.    

Cosmo? Johnny V. -bWo- Stables


Johnny - bWo 2006 TOC Champion- Going out on Top!

Total Posts: 1,813

Re: Fess Up, guys
Posted: Wednesday at 7:08p

Consider the manufacturer's web page as a legitimate link[edit]

Since the majority of "SPAM" on this page seems to be disagreements as to which websites can be added, i thought i would start a discussion.

According to the guidelines of Wikipedia, I think the manufacturer of the game should be a good start for an External Link. http:// www.sega-amusements.co.uk/derbyownersclub/


Thoughts?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.54.94.144 (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been locked[edit]

Can we please keep the nonsense to minimum please? Everything added to the article must be verifiable (see WP:V) and cite (see WP:CITE) to reliable sources (see WP:RS). If not, it gets removed. Thats all there is to it. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 19:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I think we should add the commercial page for one of the links on this site.

Please sign your posts. The only legitimate commercial link is Hormel's for Spam.
MMetro (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i.e. doc.rbcb.net is not just an informational site, it is an ecommerce haven for the illegal distribution of products related to Sega Entertainment USAs game Derby Owners Club.

One can buy keys to the game or use illegal credit card duplicating and software to cheat public arcade games.This game is not avaiable at home, just in a public location.

I agree we should rethink the commercial links on this site

i.e. http:// doc.rbcb.net/forums/Trading.or.Sales/—Preceding unsigned comment added by DerbyOwner (talkcontribs) 03:07, 18 December 2007

ah...ok i see that we are allowing the listing of an Internet forum in the External link section who abused this site for fun. J. Smith remembers this don't you.

Now, after complaining about the Trading and Sales thread that was listed publicly on their site it is ok to leave them still in the link list.

I guess all is fair in the B.S. that this discriminatory site produces.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.162.122.87 (talk) 22:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


ah...ok i see that we are allowing the listing of an Internet forum in the External link section who abused this site for fun. J. Smith remembers this don't you.

Now, after complaining about the Trading and Sales thread that was listed publicly on their site they have locked it.So i guess it is ok to still list the abusing site rather than a non-restricted, membership required one.

hmmm.. lets think about this objectively.

1) Site users who have to register and provide their email and name abuse this area of wikipedia. The thread is locked down to members only.

2) Wikipedia decides that they will cut out all of the informational links to commercial websites, but leaves the abusing websites address listed with Trading and sales links. That makes sense!

3) Wikipedia decides to keep the external links to a website that restricts public information and requires registration to view their Trading and Sales section. That makes even more sense.

All emotion aside, exactly who is making these decisions?99.162.122.87 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 22:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]