Talk:Dornford Yates

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lower Than Vermin[edit]

"an unfortunate hysterical rant in which Mercer defends his anti-Semitic and highly class-conscious attitudes"--this is a highly tendentious overstatement but I decline to engage in an editing war. --Simon Cursitor 14:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The offending passage has been removed, but I for one heartily agree with its sentiments; I could add 'bitter', 'vituperative' and several other adjectives, but then I'm not a Reliable Source. I love most of Yates' books, but that one I could not finish. If the above passage is a direct quote from a review, I think it should be reinstated. IMO, while an article as a whole should have a NPOV, if a book has been almost unanimously condemned by the critics (as I suspect this one was), the article should reflect that opinion without artificially searchiing for a contrary view or suppressing the criticism as non-neutral.
If the original editor is still keeping an eye on this page, I hope s/he can help, as I don't have the resources to research this. Nevertheless, I'll put this on my watchlist and maybe do some digging.... --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 04:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t agree as heartily as do you, but if someone said it, it should go in. Make it clear that it is a quote, and source it, and it should be fine. A selection of other views in other quotes should be included if possible, but I suspect you are right about the contemporary panning. 2A00:23C3:E284:900:5594:9C41:6BFE:639D (talk) 10:07, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

anti-Semitism[edit]

I beg leave to take issue over the accusation of anti-Semitism (although, in the interests of avoiding an edit-war I shall decline to re-edit the article to remove them, as I am aware my edits would be reverted instanter). Granted Yates' writings include unpleasant Jews. They also include unpleasant members of several other races not least Germans and (in some cases) Americans. It is, in several cases, arguable that what Yates is attacking are people who exhibit the traits attached at the period to members of the Jewish race (especially financial ruthlesness and commercial fraternity of an almost Masonic intensity) whether or not they actually are Jewish. Equally I would argue that he sheds this trait as his writings progress, making it more and more clear that, accustomed as he was to an English mileu of the pre-Wars and inter-War years, he found certain aspects of modernity repellent not least the insistence by the Socialists of his era in Britain, on dismantling the past for the sake of the dismantling, and despite any injury that they might cause. --Simon Cursitor 14:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yates and Anti-Semitism[edit]

I must disagree with the suggestion that Yates wasn't anti-semitic. It is clear throughout his work that not the majority of 'villains' in his stories are intended to be recogised as Jewish. This is demonstrated through physical descriptions, style of dress and the 'dialect' in which some of them speak. All of these rely on widely understood (in their day) stereotypes of Jewishness.

None of this is especially surprising, given how widely-accepted such anti-semitism was in popular English fiction of the early and mid-20thC. You only need to compare Yates to John Buchan, the author his fiction most obviously references, to see the similarity between Yates' characterisations of Jewish villains and Buchan's consistent vilification of Jews.

What is also striking about Yates is the bitterness which underlies his surface humour. The sense of class entitlement, and the increasing loss of that entitlement as the 20thC progresses, is extremely vivid. This becomes especially dominant in later works such as As Berry and I Were Saying, where humour is more or less absent, and the book functions as a sustained complaint against the loss of upper-class privilege. These features are all the more startling given that Mercer himself appears not to have been born into the world of privilege which he describes.Jill Lenhart 19:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He was probably fantasizing that he was a highly privileged person who had been swindled. You mention the bitterness in Mercer. So does Smithers in his biography. This Wiki article does not reflect any of that, and makes it sound like a smooth and harmonious life. Valetude (talk) 12:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It does cover the failure of his first marriage, which rather suggests his life was not all smooth and harmonious. RGCorris (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not for this page, but it is a serious mistake to suppose that Buchan was anti-Semitic. The character in the 39 Steps who expresses such sentiments gets no support from Buchan's heros ( one of whom says frankly that the fellow is a little cracked on the subject) - but that's enough for here.
What do you mean by 'not the majority'? Typo? 86.157.128.12 (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
86.157.128.12 (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If Yates had wanted to identify someone as Jewish, he would have, and not used 'code words'. A minor villain in Storm Music is Jewish, and identified so, even to stereotypicaly pronouncing 's' as 'th'. There are several other minor villains though, and I don't get the impression he was picking on that one (he does refer to him sometimes as 'the Jew'). Note his villainy is of the active kind, pricking people with knives and whatnot, not the image of soft, swindling corruption which was the usual misrepresentation of the time.
There is a sneering, disdainful attitude towards Jews in An Eye For a Tooth - by the chief villain. Not being offered as a model, really. The poster in the previous section has a good discussion of this. 2600:1010:B067:AAC8:4BC:91C9:8C31:D9F7 (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I note too, he gives unstinting praise to Rufus Isaacs, a practising Jew, in “As Berry and I Were Saying”, around pg.47 in my edition.
“...Rufus Isaacs was the most brilliant advocate. He towered above his fellows. He had a great charm of manner - an irresistible charm. Juries could not withstand it. Then again, he had an incredible memory. I never remember his referring to a note.”
Later Lord Chief Justice of England, and first Marquess of Reading. Yates clearly regarded him as ‘one of us’. 12.201.7.201 (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Language[edit]

I have changed 'accomplice' to 'colleague' as a less judgmental assessment of Mansel and Chandos's relationship and mutual activities! I am a bit concerned about the language of this article in general: "sentimental romances", "spectacularly well-crafted", "unfortunate hysterical rant". More neutral language would be desirable. And could a citation please be given for "Snobbery with violence"? Robina Fox 19:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the quotation from Forty Years On (1972) by Alan Bennett: "Sapper, Buchan, Dornford Yates, practitioners in that school of Snobbery with Violence that runs like a thread of good-class tweed through twentieth-century literature." Robina Fox 23:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, even if some of the article is not quite neutral, Colin Watson has ensured that Yates will be forever linked with the phrase, 'Snobbery with violence' ( there is your reference). It is a part of the history of the author. 12.201.7.201 (talk) 14:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Factual Error[edit]

The text says he was a pupil to a solicitor, and was later called to the Bar. Solicitors are not members of the Bar -- to be called to the Bar, Mercer would have been a pupil to a barrister. --ukexpat 14:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to Smithers' biography, there was still a means for this to happen in the Edwardian era. RGCorris (talk) 12:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misreading of Berry books?[edit]

The section on Yates' work which states that, 'They capture the self-confident social attitudes of the English upper middle classes of their time.' is a misreading of the 'Berry' books. Firstly, the characters are of the upper classes, not upper-middle classes (and that is a very significant distinction in this context). Also, they actually articulate the erosion of self-confidence and of course of actual wealth among the upper classes following the end of World War I. This is especially evident in The House That Berry Built and As Berry and I Were Saying, the two least 'comic' of the series, but it does come through in even the most light-hearted Berry novels and stories too. Indeed, that seems to be the point of the series. They're an elegy for a way of life that was already disappearing as Yates wrote the stories. Could this be reflected in the article? Jill Lenhart 19:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Jill Lenhart[reply]

Plot Summaries[edit]

I think a useful way to expand the Dornford Yates page would be to provide more plot summaries for the novels/stories. I see that someone has done this already for The House That Berry Built. I could do about a dozen more, if people don't have any objections? Mind you, I've never added whole pages and made live links before in Wikipedia, so the technicalities might take me a while! Jill Lenhart 18:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do !RGCorris (talk) 12:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation of books[edit]

The categorization of Yates's work into "Berry Books", "Chandos Books" and "Other Volumes" is based on the list that appeared in "B-Berry and I Look Back", the final work published in his lifetime, and presumably agreed with the author. Both "Gale Warning" and "Ne'er Do Well" are listed there as "Other Volumes" and the list in the article follows this categorisation. RGCorris (talk) 16:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if that was the way DY wanted it, that's the way it has to be. Don't want a lawsuit from beyond the grave (g). 73.223.117.255 (talk) 23:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why the house names?[edit]

‘Cockade’ is a funny name. Did it mean something to him?

‘Sacradown’ is part of an old nursery rhyme, part of which is ‘see saw sacradown, which is the way to London Town?’. Don’t know if this has anything to do with the house name though. More research needed.2A00:23C7:E284:CF00:E836:EF0D:C684:7E42 (talk) 21:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to Smithers, page 176, it was called Cockade "...because it projected from the hill as does a hackle from a hat". The same writer, on page 206, quotes Elizabeth Mercer as saying that the Umtali house was named out of a nursery rhyme - "To and fro, up and down, that's the way to Sacradown." RGCorris (talk) 08:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dornford Yates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dornford_Yates&oldid=1201124027"