Talk:Droeshout portrait/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs) 18:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

I think the lead needs to be expanded to better summarise the article. It contains nothing about critical evaluations or conspiracy theories, for instance. Probably needs to be about half as long again as it currently is.

OK, will do. Paul B (talk) 19:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Significance

"It is, as I may say, is the key to unlock and detect almost all the impositions ...". Is that quotation correct?

No. Corrected. Paul B (talk) 19:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

I'm not thrilled about using a 100-year-old version of a general encyclopedia as a source, although I suppose that what it's supporting isn't exactly contentious.

It's really just a convenient link to wikiquote. Paul B (talk) 19:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.