Talk:Edmonds, Washington

Edmonds, Washington has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 11, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 17, 2018.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that an enclave of Edmonds, Washington, was formed after several failed attempts at annexing the community of Esperance?

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Washington / Seattle / 50,000 Challenge Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Ken Jennings

I don't think such a trivial person as Ken Jennings belongs in the intro paragraph. How about a Trivia heading at the bottom where we can put that as well as the Roslyn Summers bit. Headquarters 19:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Jennings is a nationally recognized figure, and according to the [Notability] guidelines, a figure that has been "documented in multiple, non-trivial, independent, published sources" is considered of substantial notability to be included in Wikipedia. Though if Ken Jennings had come from a place such as NYC, there would be many people who are more notable than he. However, as Edmonds is a small town, Jennings is a good candidate as the cities claim to fame.24.17.77.57 06:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fountain

"The Edmonds fountain has been soaped several times, and was recently destroyed by a car crash": incomprehensible without more context; I live in Seattle and I don't even know what this might be about. - Jmabel | Talk 08:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, so I deleted the line. You quoted it here so if someone wants to write about it in more details, go for it! As it was the sentence was too vague to be of much value, I think. Something would need to be said described what the Edmonds fountain is, for one (it was destroyed in a car crash, but I don't have it in my to write about it). And I'm not really sure what "been soaped several times" means. So I just removed it until someone feels like describing it better. Better yet, someone could describe the Edmonds fountain itself, its position at Edmonds ground zero, its (perhaps debated) beauty, its traffic hazard, etc etc. I've seen it a lot, but don't know much about its history and purpose, its being wrecked in a crash, etc. That kind of info would be much more useful than its apparent occasional vandalization... just saying.Pfly 10:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major edit

I've added an infobox, several citations, and a new section in this edit, and if nobody objects, I'll see if I can get it a B-class rating soon. --Hojimachong^talk 02:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Edmonds, Washington

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Edmonds, Washington's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "factfinder.census.gov":

From Langley, Washington: "982 3-Digit ZCTA by 5-digit ZIP Code Tabulation Area". U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Retrieved 2006-08-04.
From Tacoma, Washington: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFPopulation?_event=Search&_name=tacoma&_state=04000US53&_county=tacoma&_cityTown=tacoma&_zip=&_sse=on&_lang=en&pctxt=fph
From Redmond, Washington: "Washington by Place - GCT-T1-R. Population Estimates". Census Bureau. 2001-04-01. Retrieved 2011-03-11.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Edmonds, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained reversion

@General Ization: What's your rationale for removing the links to Washington (state) and United States? I'd added them after trying unsuccessfully to click through to Washington. 216.249.251.243 (talk) 04:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how this was an improvement versus the existing lead:

'''Edmonds''' is a city in [[Snohomish County, Washington|Snohomish County]], [[Washington (state)|Wasington]], [[United States]]

. It a) contains a typographical error, b) unnecessarily creates a separate link for the state, and c) unnecessarily specifies that the city is in the United States, in that there is no other "Edmonds, Washington" to be disambiguated. In short, it is needlessly complex. Anyone wanting to know more about Washington (state) may click on the county name and click on the link to the state which appears there, a perfectly logical arrangement. General Ization ^Talk 20:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simply put, this is also overlinking to common terms like Washington and United States, which applies to the prose but not infoboxes (where these terms are linked). Please don't go around editing archived pages like the GAN subpage, which causes headaches for other editors. Sounder Bruce 21:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]