|WikiProject Chemicals||(Rated B-class, Mid-importance)|
The comment "Fluorosulfuric acid is often marketed by suppliers, such as Aldrich, as a antimony pentafluoride solution. This antimony pentafluoride/fluorosulfuric acid mixture is commonly known as magic acid." is erroneous.
Magic acid does contain FSO3H, and this point is well worth noting, but Magic acid is not a mere marketing ploy, it is a different chemical from FSO3H. Magic acid is a superacid, and I dont think that FSO3H is. This requires some further reading. Smokefoot 03:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Footnote Updates Needed
The footnotes need to be updated as per the Wiki standard - agree anyone?
Ryan Jones 23:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yep the footnotes are strange. A young student did this report for my class, and we are semi-clueless on format nicities. --Smokefoot 00:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Fluorosulfuric acid eats right through glass?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorosulfuric_acid says: When freed from HF by sweeping with an inert gas, it can be distilled in glass apparatus .
While http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carboranes says: ...such as fluorosulfuric acid that eats right through glass .
So which is correct? Is it the HF that eats through glass, which it is known to do?
subasd 10:41, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
FSO3H does not attack glass according to the Encyclopedia for Reagents for Organic Synthesis. FSO3H hydrolyzes to release HF, which does attack glass. I removed the misleading statement from the article. Also, colorful language like "eat glass" is fun to read but not very informative. Someone should take a look at the carborane article to help rebalance it, because carboranes are bigger than the derived acids being studies recently. --Smokefoot 13:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
The 'Related Coumpounds' section included antimony pentafluoride, which I did not consider to be a related compound. I removed it and added sulfuric acid, which is if anything the most related compound of all. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
The phrase "every drop makes a little explosion" is not well worded. The reaction is violent, but depends heavily on concentration and temperature. I changed it to read more professionally. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobobot (talk • contribs) 20:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)