Talk:Great Bealings

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Images on this page[edit]

I've reverted the change to a gallery. If Dancarney can explain what was wrong with the photos as they were, we can agree on the best way to show them. However, with six photos, a table of 2 rows of photos 3 columns wide seems to me to be a good way of showing them, at a size that can be seen but without the their loading being a problem. Please comment here before making the change again. --Phil Holmes (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The images are far bigger than those seen on any other location page I've come across (with the exception of panoramas), e.g. in the featured article, Herne Bay, Kent. In Firefox the pictures don't nicely fit on the screen and they obscure the infobox. Dancarney (talk) 17:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I gave up Firefox when it kept crashing with Google maps :-(. FWIW, even with the gallery style, setting the browser width on Firefox low enough makes the images cover the infobox - there's a bug here somewhere. Leave it with me, though - I'll mess about tomorrow and get the images somewhat smaller so that Firefox is OK on a 1280 screen.--Phil Holmes (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to work now. I've put the village sign piccy in the infobox - I thought that looked a bit tidier. Dancarney (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Bealings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928015731/http://www.holmessoft.co.uk/greatbealings/history.htm to http://www.holmessoft.co.uk/greatbealings/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]