Talk:HFB 320 Hansa Jet

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Untitled section[edit]

"As of 2006[update], it remains the only civilian aircraft ever to use a forward-swept wing."

According to this, it is not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.72.25 (talk) 17:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plan view needed[edit]

A plan view, picture or diagram, is needed. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hamburger Flugzeugbau HFB 320 Hansa Jet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120326002351/http://www.hansajet.de/indexeng.htm to http://www.hansajet.de/indexeng.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The aircraft's most defining feature are the forward-swept wings[edit]

None of the photos makes this feature visible. Surely a photo exists that better shows the wing design? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.29.228 (talk) 01:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one on the Commons shows the wing sweep clearly, which I have now added. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style[edit]

The citation style of this article has been changed recently without discussion. This really ought to have gone to talk page, as per WP:BRD, and reasoned out here with agreement, rather than been edit-warred into place. The style used on the article had been in place for roughly a decade, and I don't think it is clear which option to go for when bringing it into conformance, but whichever option it should be, discussion should be engaged in on this talk page if it has become contentious. Kyteto (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITEVAR considers helpful imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit. There was no consistent style before merging them: 16 citations + 4 Bibliography (and only 3 used). I choose to harmonize the ref style to the style most used for the article.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 00:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]