This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
I have added the cleanup template to address the issue of original research in this article. Statements such as "he is known as the infamous and powerful Mad Mage" and the he is "a wizard of undeniable prowess" are not supportes by any citation and represent unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas about this fictional character that are not supported in reality.--Gavin Collins (talk) 08:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Again, not OR, but rather a fact notation. Cleaning up behind you again. Web Warlock (talk) 13:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alas not a fact or opinion that can be supported in the real-world. I would be grateful if you would restore the OR cleanup template. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of things I'd be happy with too, I have come to realize that those things don't happen. There is no basis here for an OR tag, if you lack the prerequisite subject matter knowledge to be able to know that then perhaps a change of topics for you to work on is in order? Get a fresh perspective. Web Warlock (talk) 14:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
