Talk:Harry Pearson (audio critic)

Is it possible to make a wikipedia search for "Harry Pearson" result in a "Harry Pearson disambiguation" page? Typing in "Harry Pearson" directs to the cricketer. Robertromejr (talk) 19:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hagiography in lede

"Pearson is considered the most influential figure in the history of audiophile journalism.[1]"

The footnote is to an obituary written in his own magazine, by a friend and co-worker/employee. I think that is pushing it in terms of sourcing, especially when there are other competing figures (J. Gordon Holt, for example).

I think it should be removed, or at the very least, rephrased in a less superlative manner. Huw Powell (talk) 02:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

As an audiophile of 60+ years I personally agree with that statement about Pearson as is. That said, you could modify it to say he "is widely considered to be . . ." Arahl1 (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Pearson (audio critic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160507142442/http://www.therecordofwilkes.com/newsa.asp?edition_number=788&pg=L to http://www.therecordofwilkes.com/newsa.asp?edition_number=788&pg=L

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)