Talk:Hellcats/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: one found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Reasonably well written apart from: The CW has announced that Hellcats is moving to Tuesday nights, at 9/8c, "9/8c" needs clarification, we don't use abbreviations. There are other instances of this.

   Switched 9/8c for 9-10pm. Is it better? Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

   Recption and accoldes sections: Stray sentences, Accolades is only one sentence, please consolidate into previous section

   Done! Is it better now? Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref #59[2] is a dead link. The newspaper only keeeps stories for 30 days, nothing in the Internet Archive. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

   Otherwise references check out, RS, no OR

   Couldn't find an alternative link, so I removed the line from the article. Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail, no trivia

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, on hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

   Thanks for reviewing the article! Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

   Ok, I think that ticks the boxes. I am happy to list this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)