Talk:History of Shrewsbury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First House of Commons in Shrewsbury[edit]

The article does not appear to say that the First House of Commons was in Shrewsbury [1]. Comments? Jniech (talk) 14:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a dubious claim at best. So many places in England claim to be home of the first Parliament or first this or that. David (talk) 14:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can I ask who else claims to have held the first House of Commons in their town/city? Wikipedia is about what can be shown not what we think. As other encyclopaedias [2], major news organisations [3] and numerous other sites[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] say it is Shrewsbury I would say it should be in the article with perhaps a reference to the other claims provided there is proof of their claim. Jniech (talk) 08:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, put it in the article then. David (talk) 08:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have examples of other claims which I can reference to show it may not be true? Jniech (talk) 10:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation[edit]

I have removed the references to a possible Roman foundation as unsubstantiated. The name means something like "scrub-bury" and first occurs in 901. It is not clear whether scrub is a personal name "Scrobb" or refers to vegetation. It is likely that any urban population still at Viroconium was moved to Shrewsbury, but I would suggest that c.900 is the most likely date for this. This is the period when a number of fortified burhs were built in Mercia, to stabilise the country under English control at the time of Danish invasion. Unfortunately, unless archaeology yields results the status of the town before 900 is a matter of speculation. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Shrewsbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Shrewsbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]