Talk:History of terrorism/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
After a brief look, I am quick failing this article per the quick-fail criteria. The article is full of maintenance tags, has no lead sections and some sections have no references at all. I also notice that during the last GA review, another reviewer has also failed this because of similar concerns. As a reminder, please do not simply resubmit to GA nomination to get another review, but instead used the advices given here to try to improve the article. It may be helpful if you looked at the Wikipedia:Good article criteria before nomination.—Chris! _ct 00:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What advice? you've offered no solutions, only problems. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#Giving_problems.2C_not_solutions advice on a NPOV lead in would be helpful! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.41.111 (talk) 10:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this article is so far away from the GA criteria, that is why I failed it. It is hard to give you a full lists of problems. So my advise is to first look at Wikipedia's writing guide such as Wikipedia:Article development, WP:Lead. If necessary, you could send the article to Wikipedia:Peer review to get specific advices on how to improve the article.—Chris! _ct 00:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats just a cop out, how can be improved if your unwilling to actually say what the so called "problems" let alone suggest solution. please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#Giving_problems.2C_not_solutions —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.183.26 (talk) 20:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]