Talk:Hoodoo (John Fogerty album)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Smoothed out the writing[edit]
I hope you all like it. 68Kustom (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Nice work. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 06:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ditto. Added a couple of sections. Updated wiki project class/import. LanceBarber (talk) 21:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Hoodoo (John Fogerty album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090925152843/http://www.cameroncrowe.com:80/eyes_ears/articles/crowe_fogerty.html to http://www.cameroncrowe.com/eyes_ears/articles/crowe_fogerty.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Critical reviews[edit]
I had originally added a line and sources on critical reception of the bootleg copy, but afterward thought perhaps that was not appropriate or relevant info since the album is not an official release, and also thought the sources might not be considered reliable enough as they were predominantly from independent web critics. I manually reverted the article to its original form. I will not be contributing to Wikipedia further, but wanted to raise topic for further discussion among those who may wish to edit this page. Thanks! Rmrarchiver (talk) 15:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)