Jump to content

Talk:Hyperchromicity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Hyperchromaticity)

Merge them

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I agree that Hyperchromicity and Hyperchromic effect should be merged. Skyrocket654 (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 20 January 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. In the words of User:Alsee, these are opposite terms for the identical concept. Sources appear to discuss these two terms together. I have created a redirect from Hypochromicity to Hyperchromicity so readers can answer their question no matter which term they come looking for. EdJohnston (talk) 02:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



HyperchromicityHypochromicity – There is actually no such thing as hyperchromicity. The interaction of the the electron dipole moments of the bases in DNA and RNA results in a decrease in absorbance, which is referred to as hypochromicity. For reference, see the classic text: BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, Part II: Techniques for the study of biological structure and function, Cantor, C.R. and Schimmel, P. R., 1980, W.H. Freeman, chapter 7 . Spincole (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak no-move. Google gives me 24k hits for Hyperchromicity and 21k hits for Hypochromicity. All of the top hits for both appear to be technical-chemistry related. It appears that both terms are equally legitimate. They appear to be opposite terms for the identical concept. I suggest that one of Hyperchromicity/Hypochromicity be a redirect to the other, and sentence or two be added explaining the relationship of the two terms. Unless I'm missing something, I don't see much difference which page-title we use. The Google results slightly favor the current title, and keeping the current title avoids the work to re-write the article and change any pages that already link here. Alsee (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.